Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Michael O'Hanlon and Robert Kagan on This Week in Politics

Michael O'Hanlon and Robert Kagan talking about taking Georgia into NATO and whether it would be poking Russia in the eye to allow them in. After talking about their views on the Presidential candi...  
 
Customize

More From: videocafeblog

Loading...

QuickList(0)

9 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,064 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (16)   Options

Loading...
Robguy66 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Darnnit - doesn't Russia know that only the US can attack sovereign nations.
angel2901 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
lol!
GeTarHrO (7 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
are you serious? hmm define sovereignty
getplaning (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Now the media are revising the facts to manage public perception, just as they did with the fictional WMD in Iraq. Nearly every article and TV news segment in the neoconservative corporate media begins with accusations of Russian aggression, concealing the fact that the Georgian Army bombarded and invaded the capital of South Ossetia one full day before the first Russian even tank crossed the border. By the time the Russians arrived, the city was already in a shambles and thousands were dead.
cvjucla3 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Did you see the Fareed Zakaria's GPS Sunday Program. CNN's Gen. Grange concludes that he thinks that the Russians may have prompted the Georgian attack by using South Ossetia proxies to attack Georgia first. Even foreign policy experts, Zbignew Brezinski and Richard Holbrooke, who have been friendly to Obama in the past, have portrayed Russia as the "bad guys." There views are not exactly what I have been reading in the newspapers. There seems to be a lack of continuity in the media right now.
getplaning (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Russia deployed its tanks and troops to South Ossetia to save the lives of civilians and to reestablish the peace. It has no interest in annexing the former-Soviet country or in expanding its present borders.
Brzezinski and Holbrooke are veteran cold warriors. They are not bungling neocons like Feith and Rumsfeld. They know what they are doing and they are good at it. They have aligned themselves with the Obama camp and are preparing for the next big outbreak of global trouble-making.
cvjucla3 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Obama was totally appropriate in his response. He was both evenhanded and fair with respect to the Russia/Georgia conflict. Obama's foreign policy approach is exactly what the international community has been clamoring from the U.S.: a fair and honest broker; not the Russians are the bad guys; or the Palestinians are the bad guys; or, I can only see things in black or white, which is the McCain, GOP, and certainly the Bush administration's approach.
cvjucla3 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
There is no condemnation whatsoever by the U.S. that Georgia started this conflict. Saakashvili was even warned by the U.S. to not engage the breakaway regions militarily prior to the conflict. And there is no reason that we should be pushing to put a missle defense shield in Poland to protect it from "rogue states," such as Iran. Iran is not going to attack Poland. This is very provocative behavior that the U.S. is engaging. The months cannot come sooner to get the Bush adm. out of office.
cvjucla3 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Let me be clear. Russia's response was overkill, and it should pull back its forces from Georgia. But we have no moral ground to be so forceful in our condemnation of the Russians. O'Hanlon and Kagan are big time supporters of the Iraq War. And the notion that it is okay to invade another sovereign nation, Iraq, based on lies and deception because Saddam was a bad guy is preposterous. There were other dictators in the world committing acts of genocide where the U.S. did nothing about it.
asdffd (1 year ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
Fuck these two lying neocon assholes. Saddam killed a million people? I guess if you include the Iran/Iraq war he did. Then again, given that we sided with Iraq/Saddam during that war you could say the US helped to kill most of those million. Neocons routinely peddle lies and half truths- and our bullshit media never calls them on it.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.