Great Global Warming Swindle ABC Debates Part 5/9

This is the Australian Broadcasting Corporations presentation and debate of Martin Durkins documentary, The Great Global Warming Swindle.

• Category

  People & Blogs

[waltermh111]

So having 3 skeptics able to give uninterrupted answers was not impartial?

To be honest, it was a more balanced panel then the balance of the debate in reality.

This was about 6:40 while the climate community is much more in favor of GW.

How is it unfair when skeptics were given ample time to talk.

[goog2k]

In just FIVE YEARS between 2004-2009 the thickness of arctic ice has DROPPED 42%.

This was discovered by NASA satellite measurements. Reported 7/7/09

Search:

New NASA Satellite Survey Reveals Dramatic Arctic Sea Ice Thinning

Global Warming is changing our world NOW. CO2 is 35% above levels for 650,000 years. In just 30 years CO2 will be over 450ppm, enough to acidify oceans to the point of stopping the growth of many planktons and corals. They are at the base of the oceans' food chain.

[shawso7]

@1:30 "robust conclusions"?

Its impressive how "Man-made" Global Warming cultists love claiming they have a majority "concensus". HA!! An example of the fraud is exposed in this video @0:52 when a reponse letter of one of the "peer review scientists" for the IPCC is read showing how disgusted he was, BUT he was STILL included as part of the so-called 2000 supporters! Sadly, there are many other NEGATIVE scientific reviews that were fraudulently used this as IPCC "support"!

[shawso7]

I've gave 2 reply/posts to yours, but failed to tag "waltermh111" so please review at your convenience. They begin:

You talking about 8:12 Part 7/9 not Part 5/9, right? ....

AND

CONTINUED...

Keep in mind, I am NOT arguing whether the Earth is getting warmer......

[shawso7]

CONTINUED...

Keep in mind, I am NOT arguing whether the Earth is getting warmer. But "why" is it getting warmer? One camp says "man-made" whereas history (ice core data) proves its a natural cycle. A history that even the leading climatologists & "man-made global warming experts admit, as has been exposed in this video series! The honest question for you is: "Do you agree with ALL the evidence (ice core data included) or do you discard it as irrelevant."

MOST MMGW proponents ignore it.

[shawso7]

You talking about 8:12 Part 7/9 not Part 5/9, right? Part 7/9 @8:25 Global Scientist states CO2 "..definately been much higher in the past. 55 million yrs ago they were substantially higher. I think over 2000 parts per million in the crutateous & jurassic period they were over than 10 times the concentration they are now."

Part 7/9@2:48 "Its certainly true that in those iceage interglacial periods that carbon dioxide DID NOT LEAD the temperatures. It was actually the temperatures starting first"

[waltermh111]

Shows how much you havent done research when you think the 8:12 point of your reference supports your belief.

greenman3610 has covered such issues. I suggest you watch his videos if you really care about the issue, or also potholer videos.

[shawso7]

Thanks for that 6:40 time stamp. Its 5 seconds after GW Scientist attempts to cut off the "skeptic" AGAIN. Interestingly, GWScientist "David" has a nasty habit through out this entire series of interrupting & belittling the "skeptics". Most notably in Part 7/9:

youtube com/watch?v=QIzztkyovjc&featur­e=related

where he INADVERTANTLY ADMITS the ice core data proves TEMPERATURE LEADS CO2 INCREASES & is CAUSED by EARTH's ORBIT AROUND SUN. Then @8:12 admits HIGHER CO2 (2000ppm) in past & 380ppm TODAY!

[fusedchromosome]

It's interesting how Carter tries to downplay Durkin's utterly dishonest (or just plain stupid) mistake about volcanoes emitting more CO2 than humans. This is a very basic scientific fact that any half-competent researcher should have picked up on prior to putting it into a "documentary" that tries to accuse scientists of being dishonest and/or incompetent.

[fusedchromosome]

at 0:30 Carter says "...I use diagrams which are 50 years old. Science is not torn up and thrown away. It's built upon."

Yes it is. That's why you don't go running to 50 year old diagrams when current ones provide new information. Carter is full of shit.