NG
Upload
Alert icon

Graham's Number - Numberphile

numberphile numberphile·141 videos
451,439
554,399
Like     Dislike 113

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like numberphile's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike numberphile's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add numberphile's video to your playlist.

Published on Apr 4, 2012

A number so epic it will collapse your brain into a black hole! Yet Tony Padilla and Matt Parker take the risk of discussing its magnitude. Watch with caution.

See also our video about the Googol and Googolplex at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GEebx...

Website: http://www.numberphile.com/
Numberphile on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/numberphile
Numberphile tweets: https://twitter.com/numberphile
Videos by Brady Haran

More about Matt and Tony at: http://www.numberphile.com/team/index...

Matt's section filmed at the Champagne Bar at St Pancras train station.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Video Responses

This video is a response to The LONGEST time - Numberphile

All Comments (4,134)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • WineRedEchos

    the point isn't the large number, it's that it's the largest number with a purpose.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate WineRedEchos's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate WineRedEchos's comment.
    in reply to imCalezu (Show the comment)
  • epicman13ful

    Tell me how multiplying made me "scuk at this" exactly how was I wrong, If its something on how I tried to show exponents thats what g9999... is.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate epicman13ful's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate epicman13ful's comment.
    in reply to Peter Geras (Show the comment)
  • ananda pryana

    Anything that you can write within 500 characters, that doesn't use the same arrow notation/power tower concept as graham number or reference the graham number itself, is never going to be even remotely as big as g1, let alone g64.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ananda pryana's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ananda pryana's comment.
    in reply to Addison Craven (Show the comment)
  • Trent Houliston

    You wouldn't have even witten enough of it to be noticeable... Seriously, the stupidity of how big that number is is insane

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Trent Houliston's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Trent Houliston's comment.
    in reply to Addison Craven (Show the comment)
  • Peter Geras

    g(g0) > your number. And you multiplied numbers together? Seriously, you suck at this, stop trying.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Peter Geras's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Peter Geras's comment.
    in reply to epicman13ful (Show the comment)
  • bdiddy77777

    "1 googolplexianth of a second" is much smaller than the Planck time (~10^-43 s), so that wouldn't work, physically speaking. But again, we would never be able to write it out in any possible form of matter since there are only ~10^80 particles in the known universe. And graham's number is obviously bigger than that.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bdiddy77777's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bdiddy77777's comment.
    in reply to Addison Craven (Show the comment)
  • epicman13ful

    g99999999999999999999999999999­999999999999999999999999999999­9999999999999999 X (prev said) X (prev said) X g Get wrecked fagget

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate epicman13ful's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate epicman13ful's comment.
    in reply to Peter Geras (Show the comment)
  • martharulesok

    g66 = my number, bitches

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate martharulesok's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate martharulesok's comment.
  • krishna maverick

    I can sense my brain turning to a black ....omgggggggggggggggggg......­........

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate krishna maverick's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate krishna maverick's comment.
  • Peter Geras

    g65 > your number.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Peter Geras's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Peter Geras's comment.
    in reply to imCalezu (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later