Pat Michaels admits: '40 percent' of funding comes from big oil.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like climatebrad's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike climatebrad's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add climatebrad's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Aug 15, 2010
8/15/10: Fareed Zakaria, Gavin Schmidt, and Jeffrey Sachs discuss how to confront the catastrophic threat of global warming as Pat Michaels admits he's a fossil-funded mouthpiece for doing nothing.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
0:37
Baby Jaguar (Cub) Chews Finger Then "Roars" a Baby Roarby Creatures Great & SmallFeatured
2,696,143
-
38:34
Dr. James Hansen: Facing the Truth About Global Warmingby REatStevens
6,142 views
-
9:42
Global Warming Debate-2010-08-16-0-1.movby berkeleylive
3,093 views
-
5:52
Patrick J. Michaels discusses Climategate on CNNby catoinstitutevideo
9,092 views
-
8:12
Inhofe, Boxer Debate Global Warming on Larry King Liveby InhofeEPWPress
77,411 views
-
5:51
Patrick J. Michaels on Climate Changeby catoinstitutevideo
3,720 views
-
1:55:34
Communicating Climate Change Scienceby columbiauniversity
713 views
-
0:51
Pat Michaels, from 20 years ago, on the global warming battleby acx1n9s
370 views
-
47:17
Cato Events - Global Warming: Some Convenient Factsby universalcosmos
178 views
-
7:55
Steven Rattner with Fareed Zakaria on Auto Industry and Obama, 1 of 2by AfriSynergy
420 views
-
1:13:54
Answering Climate Change Skeptics, Naomi Oreskesby UniversityOfRI
32,239 views
-
1:54:12
Experts Debate Climate Change Science, Policyby UVALawSchool
16,859 views
-
15:24
Monckton Bunkum Part 2 - Sensitivityby potholer54
42,744 views
-
14:53
Patrick Michaels' Climate Coup, part 1by i2idotorg
369 views
-
9:55
Don't Panic - Flaws In Catastrophic Global Warming Forecastsby coyoteblog
23,746 views
-
36:23
Global Warming where is the alarm? with Dr. John Christyby AuburnUniversity
5,682 views
-
7:25
3 - Climate Change -- Anatomy of a mythby potholer54
116,479 views
-
11:13
Riz Khan's One on One - Jeffrey Sachs - 15 Sep 07 - Part 1by AlJazeeraEnglish
5,267 views
-
1:19
The Secret Life of Scientists | Gavin Schmidt and the Juggler's Apprenticeby NOVA PBS
1,721 views
-
10:19
2. Climate Change -- the objectionsby potholer54
122,346 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
MrHicks091 2 years ago
Well all he was doing was giving an estimate-it's most likely *above* 50%. What this proves, though, is that he gets a substantial amount of money from the fossil fuel industry-which makes his anti GHG abatement views extremely suspicious.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
maityouwhat 2 years ago
His body language says it all. Thank you, Fareed. Science will prevail. Hopefully.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (14)
Jonathan Calabretta 5 months ago
No, no he isn't.
Hansen accepted pro bono legal advice from the Government Accountability Project on how to avoid retaliation from the Bush administration for refusing to cook the books to promote the denier talking points.
This was spun into something wrong via lots of lies by Investors Business Daily see tinyurl dot com/c6d4omc .
Hansen utterly nailed the increase in temperature over the past quarter century back in 1988 and the deniers have hated him ever since.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
tabber87 5 months ago
James Hansen is funded by George Soros.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Jonathan Calabretta 5 months ago
Because the flatearthers funding allows them to be taken seriously after their positions are refuted.
While genuine scientists like James Hansen are smeared as "unreliable" or far worse by known con artists like Michaels who even admits to being a shill for Big Oil (as you have just seen here) as well as fabricating statements he attributed to Hansen in an effort to sabotage Hansen's creditability.
The fact that people like you believe Michaels ilk is absolute proof the smart to do is be scared.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
tabber87 1 year ago
Who cares where his funding comes from? He's arguing scientific issues. If he's nothing more than an oil-company shill than his positions should be easily refutable. Why are people so scared of these "flat-earther's" funding?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Derek Gunn 1 year ago
- do you have ANY evidence of that?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
trzajec 2 years ago
OK, and the IPCC is 100% founded by the people who tell them what to find out.
Now what?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
MoJoSB 2 years ago
You know damn well it's over 50% and you know that he is 100% full of shit.
Why in the fuck anyone who wasn't getting paid say global warming is not happening. That is what I don't understand about so many who post about climate change on you tube. It's in your best interest to have clean air, don't you think?
Are you getting paid and if you are, who is doing the hiring? If the world is going to shit, might as well get PAID, right? That is good old capitalist think.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
lumajs 2 years ago
If he's only 40% funded by the oil industry, 40% is still less than 50%, so he is still mostly funded by the non-oil industry, so he may still be biased against the oil industry. ;-)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube