US economy & Occupy Wall Street-On the Edge with Max Keiser-10-14-2011

http://www.presstv.com/Program/204709...

In this edition of the show Max interviews Jeff Berwick from dollarvigilante.com.

He will talk about the latest on the US dollar devaluation and US economic outlook in general.

He also talks about the Occupy Wall Street and Occupy the Fed movements which are spreading across America.

We also discuss Congressman Kucinich's effort to bring the US Federal Reserve under the control of the Treasury Department.

• Category

  News & Politics

[SynapticTransmission]

Anarchy simply means the absence of rulers. Not the absence of laws.

You're the one who watches too much TV.

[dmurphy25]

What kind of 'match' is it when the referee is working with one of the teams Max?

[Michael Shanklin]

No thanks,... I don't want law violently monopolized to government. I would rather have efficient law and freedom...

watch?v=YmXDrm5Q-eQ

watch?v=V0_Jd_MzGCw

watch?v=8kPyrq6SEL0

watch?v=XUA4h8ctNWM

watch?v=Gl1b7jKYNTE

[lawes84]

the free market is the referee, and govt should only exist to uphold the law of the land and maintain a court system.

[lawes84]

max keiser is an idiot, and this video proves it.

keiser is pro statist, and secretly loves central banking

[John Mcgovern]

what if the referee is on the side of the other team?

[pretorious700]

This is the first vid I've seen of Max in which he exhibits a bit of economic ignorance-concerning inflation. Prices are only a symptom of inflation, like Jeff says, inflation is basically too much currency in circulation relative to goods and demand.

[pretorious700]

actually, if you use pro wrestling as a metaphor, it's pretty accurate. Everybody is pretending it's real, and the referee is in on the scam. I agree, if his notion is that the government cares about integrity,that's beyond ridiculous.

[Mike Durland]

Max calling the government a "referee" is completely ridiculous.

[heckler73]

21:18 There's the crux...of the biscuit

[xcvsdxvsx]

on an abstract level its still a paradox, someone has to make the laws and they would have to be considered rulers. Even if 99% of the population worked to gather to create the laws and all agreed with them they would still be "ruling" the 1%.