Obama Constitution Negative Liberties.flv

Obama talking about the negative liberties of the constitution and redistribution of wealth

• Category

  News & Politics

[Cajun76]

"Would you like to report this video as inappropriate?"

No, I would like to report Obama as inappropriate.

[NCMan28025]

yes, how dare someone use Obama's own words. Hard to change what the idiot said. What do you think he meant, since you claim his words were "twisted."

[liberalmann]

Wtf is ' ad hominem logical fallacy?' Moron.

[Lorenzo Carrazana]

Wow, what an outstanding use of the ad hominem logical fallacy.

[liberalmann]

Sure, I am. But I'm also not a hater.

[Chris Redfield]

#37 in terms of income equality. Liberal man- would you care to share which states are the leading indicators of this inequality???

HINT: BLUE

[ArcoZakus]

Thank you. I just might be both a redneck AND stupid. If you are right about my intelligence then there must not be any correlation between that and wealth. I, on the other hand, suspect you might be very intelligent. Are you also highly educated?

[liberalmann]

If you equate wealth to motivation and poverty to sloth, you might be a redneck! Lol. You sure are stupid, that's for sure.

[ArcoZakus]

Are Cuba and N. Korea ahead of the US on that list? Even after tax cuts, what portion of the total cost of governent do the wealthiest 1% pay? WAY more than their "fair share". Everyone I've known who had more money than I do was smarter, worked harder, and/or longer, than I had. The opposite for those who had less. The exception is cheaters, like Bernie Madoff, who usually go to jail. The government should assure equal opportunity to succeed, NOT an equal outcome. It's not in the Constitution.

[ArcoZakus]

No one needs to tell him that -- he knows it already. The problem is not him being ignorant of the Constitution or what the Founding Fathers intended. The problem is his *contempt* for it and for them. He's still working on getting enough voters to see him as their Santa Claus to get the 22nd ammendment tossed. Then he'll be able to eliminate the others by executive order. Anyone who doubts it, did you expect even a second term? (I hope I am SO wrong.)

[ArcoZakus]

But he would not have to "fundamentally transform" N. Korea, like he wants to do to the US. Besides, *he* is not so much the problem as a symptom. The *real* problem is all of the people who elected him, or did not show up to defeat him. I blame both. Some say he will be less extreme in his second term due to concern for his legacy. Bah! He's shooting for a legacy like Castro's, Stalin's or Mao's, now that he has "more flexibility".

[John Tminustwentyminutes Mercier]

U.S. Constitution...hello? This gift called America came packaged as limited government for good reason. They wern't building a nanny state.

"It is to be remembered that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects."- James Madison.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure."- Thomas Jefferson.