Watch this video in a new window

NVIDIA: Adam & Jamie draw a MONA LISA in 80 milliseconds!

Channel Icon
Annotations
artmaze1974

NVIDIA: Adam and Jamie, hosts of the known mythbusters show compared a CPU vs a GPU to explain parallel processing and the GPU drew an ACTUAL mona lisa drawing using paint balls in 80 milliseconds!...
NVIDIA: Adam and Jamie, hosts of the known mythbusters show compared a CPU vs a GPU to explain parallel processing and the GPU drew an ACTUAL mona lisa drawing using paint balls in 80 milliseconds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this was for NVIDIA's NVISION Show
Category:  Science & Technology
Customize
Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to MythBusters YouTube Live
7,265 ratings
Sign in to rate
3,000,989 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Statistics & Data
Loading...
Video Responses (10)
Sign in to post a Comment
Text Comments (3,202)  Options
Loading...
e717ssss (9 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Led Zeppelin Rules.
J7c1ChickenXx (19 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
uh what !
edwardjt117 (22 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@7raczyk none of that matters. The demo has little to do with what they are actually using to present and more with the metaphor of GPU processing compared to CPU processing. I'm still not certain how you missed that? I mean you are arguing that when a person says that "He isn't the brightest bulb of the bunch" that they are really comparing them to a light bulb and well...that would make you a very dim bulb indeed.
7raczyk (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This doesn't compare anything. Those 1100 paintball guns were all aligned manually and all specially preloaded with a certain paint ball. And a moderate micro-controller that runs at 100mhz would be able to power the simple small script that they used for the machine shown in the video. It's a matter of finding step motors with enough precision. And you wouldn't need a GPU that specializes in vectors, 3D meshes and bitmaps to fire all the PB guns, more like a simple m-controller with a lot ports
1nfinitum (3 days ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
You're over-analyzing it. Don't try to look beyond what these are. These are just demonstrations used to help ordinary people better grasp the concepts of why we need GPU's for our more powerful applications. The first demo is meant to show how a CPU handles graphics (one step at a time) and the second how a GPU handles graphics, with multiple operations being carried out simultaneously.
johnyyonehand (1 week ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
This smile is busted! ^^
lelandrb (1 week ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
That is so bad ass.
futurepilot1000 (1 week ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
just imagine if that hits you
kiov (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
How does this prove that a gpu is faster than a cpu?
juulie19 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It isnt, it does more things at an slower speed
Pages: 1 2 3  ... 

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.