Watch this video in a new window

Secret Ballot In Name Only

Gordon Lafer, a professor at the University of Oregon, discusses how employers and their "union-avoidance" consultants have undermined secret ballots under current NLRB election rules.
Gordon Lafer, a professor at the University of Oregon, discusses how employers and their "union-avoidance" consultants have undermined secret ballots under current NLRB election rules.
Category:  News & Politics
Tags: 
Customize
16 ratings
Sign in to rate
2,419 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Statistics & Data
Loading...
Video Responses (0)
This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment
Text Comments (9)  Options
Loading...
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
FluxCapacitor2008 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
MYTH: EFCA will prevent the use of secret-ballot elections.

REALITY: EFCA does not strip workers of their right to choose a secret-ballot election to decide whether to select -- or not to select -- a union representative. EFCA simply gives workers the additional option of selecting a union representative by majority sign-up. 
Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), there are three ways for workers to form a union:
AndreRGSanchez (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The secret ballot is an abomination, and the impossibility of keeping it truly secret was known hundreds of years ago. It is just secret enough to corrupt society. That being said, there should not be "union elections", period.
econdemocracy (4 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
in Canada if 51% want a union, they get one...as someone pointed out, if politicians had to get 51% many would be out of office..so 51% is already a HIGH BAR and high enough..what we have right now is a paradise for union-busting practices...
thompsfloyd (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The requirements for certification vary between provinces & territories. Each Labour board sets out the criteria. In Ontario, if 51% of the "approved" staff, employed on the day that the certification application is registered, the OLRB will then accept it and make a ruling. inactual fact, Bill 144 has made ontario a paradise for union Salting and organizing. Where as the Alberta government has taken away some of the organizing powers and advantages that the unions once enjoyed.
mjhanagan (7 months ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
Wow, Loretta Sanchez has LOTS of experience with vote fraud so she is the perfect person to be asking questions about vote secrecy.
thompsfloyd (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
what is scary about this video, is the hypocrisy and lies that are accepted as fact.
mcradiation (2 years ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Very nice.
JenniferSargent (2 years ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Wow, this is scary. Prof. Lafer gives a very succinct description of how employers bully people out of joining a union. Yikes!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.