Voice calls won't get through and crash networks: Twitter message more likely to get through & lets those who MUST use voice. Another "21st-century disaster tip you WON'T hear from officials." (PS:...
Voice calls won't get through and crash networks: Twitter message more likely to get through & lets those who MUST use voice. Another "21st-century disaster tip you WON'T hear from officials." (PS: I did this in 2007, before Twitter became mainstream, so pardon dismissive comments about it being used primarily by young people: IMHO, it's best tool for daily communication in 9/08)
I have a question about the number of characters you mention. Are you stating a minimum or a maximum?
I sure hope if a disaster happens something will work. The greatest fear is that NONE of the systems will work, say as in worst possible scenario. Something with EMF effects that would harm the networks?
But for all other, great ideas here. Thanks for the tips and I just subscribed. Looking forward to more.
The internet can be seen as more of a tool on your utility belt, rather then your only safety line.
As a Radio Amateur, we are taught that sometimes when there is an emergency sometimes we can't count on normal modes of communicating including but not limited to text messaging. While using Twitter isn't a bad idea, people also need to realize that they may need a different means of communicating besides their cellphone.
Sorry: you need to look at Twitter again. This "rubbish" site is now used by the President-elect of the United States, major news organizations, and a lot of very mature, focused adults. You're screwing yourself if you let rash judgments get in the way of sound preparations.
I think the consensus of those who hate Twitter is, who cares what you're doing? If you care; call, visit!
Because it's become a pop culture phenomenon does that make it good or useful? I personally don't think so. I will never be on there myself. To those who will that's their call, best of luck! :)
That's definitely a valid issue: what things like Twitter can do is meet needs of some people, allowing 1st responders to concentrate on those, such as elderly, disabled, who aren't reached otherwise.
Exactly! I refer to all of these options: Twitter, Flickr, Qik, etc. as parts of the "mix" -- you try all of them, not knowing in advance which will still be operative.
I sure hope if a disaster happens something will work. The greatest fear is that NONE of the systems will work, say as in worst possible scenario. Something with EMF effects that would harm the networks?
But for all other, great ideas here. Thanks for the tips and I just subscribed. Looking forward to more.
As a Radio Amateur, we are taught that sometimes when there is an emergency sometimes we can't count on normal modes of communicating including but not limited to text messaging. While using Twitter isn't a bad idea, people also need to realize that they may need a different means of communicating besides their cellphone.
Because it's become a pop culture phenomenon does that make it good or useful? I personally don't think so. I will never be on there myself. To those who will that's their call, best of luck! :)