Upload
4,177

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...

SEPTEMBER CLUES

911 AMATEUR part1-3

Loading...
  1. 1

    911 AMATEUR part1

    by simonshack 128,159 views

    The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://septemberclues.info

    Please watch my 90-min SEPTEMBER CLUES research documentary before leaving any comments on this video, thanks : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpE

    The 9/11 TV hoax is now fully exposed : The entire Manhattan scenery was composed with digital imagery so as to sell a phony tale of " hijacked aircrafts " striking the Twin Towers. These analyses demonstrate how digital imaging techniques were also used to concoct supposed "amateur videos". Those videos were credited to (either complicit or wholly invented) individuals - but where more likely crafted by a single entity - most likely the now defunct "Camera Planet" studios owned by Steven Rosenbaum.

    "911 AMATEUR" part2 :
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM&fmt=6

    "911 AMATEUR" part3 :
    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts&fmt=6

    Our research forum: http://cluesforum.info

  2. 2

    911 AMATEUR part2

    by simonshack 83,119 views

    Conclusive proof of Naudet fakery here: http://tinyurl.com/naudetCF

    IMPORTANT UPDATE : I have posted a higher-resolution version of this study (extracted from the original DVD of the Naudet's movie "911") here :
    "THE PLANE FACTS " : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkZKOqYMbXo&fmt=18

    SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info
    (Please watch my SEPTEMBER CLUES research documentary (90min) before leaving any comments on this video, thanks).

    911 AMATEUR pt2 :
    If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice.

    The Naudet footage is perhaps the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak. It was included in the Naudet brothers feature movie "911" distributed by Paramount - all over the world's cinema halls.

    My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ).

    MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
    We may observe that the visible right side ( not covered by 1st explosion dust) of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, more than 30% of the wall is still intact - AFTER the 1st impact. At the 6sec mark we see shape charges igniting and eventually ripping open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.

    Please watch also:

    911 AMATEUR part1 :
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&fmt=6

    911 AMATEUR part3 :
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts&fmt=6


    Our research forum: http://cluesforum.info

  3. 3

    911 AMATEUR part3NEW

    by simonshack 50,464 views

    The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://septemberclues.info

    Please watch my 90-min SEPTEMBER CLUES research documentary before leaving any comments on this video, thanks.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpE


    This is a video analysis of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots of "flight 175" hitting WTC2 on 9/11. The inescapable conclusion is that they have all been forged to back up the poor forgeries of impacting 'airplanes' seen on LIVE TV.

    THE SHOTS ARE CREDITED TO :
    1 : Evan Fairbanks
    2 : Luc Courchesne
    3 : Michael Hezarkhani
    4 : Tina Cart

    Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.

    Please watch also:
    911 AMATEUR part1 :
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&fmt=6
    911 AMATEUR part2 :
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM&fmt=6

    our research forum: http://cluesforum.info

Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later