Profile
Name:
Mike
Channel Views:
1,247
Joined:
Nov 7, 2006
Latest Activity:
1 day ago
Subscribers:
9
Country:
United States
Interests:
Origami, Anime, Video Games
Movies:
Serenity, V for Vendetta, Ocean's Eleven, Matrix (just the first really, the series fell apart from there), Chronicles of Riddick (series), Star Wars (series), The 10th Kingdom (miniseries), Matchstick Men
Subscriptions
(75)
Subscribers
(9)
Recent Activity
|
|
ytmikelol liked a video
Irish economist David McWilliams explains the ECB's massive cash for trash scheme -- bailing out banks with your money.
Writer/Director: David McWi... more |
|
|
|
ytmikelol added a new video to End The Fed
Irish economist David McWilliams explains the ECB's massive cash for trash scheme -- bailing out banks with your money.
Writer/Director: David McWi... more |
|
|
|
ytmikelol added new videos to Ron Paul
|
|
|
|
ytmikelol liked a video
Ron Paul's consistently strong anti-war message is one that resonates with many U.S. troops today. Hundreds of active duty troops, veterans, and P...
more
|
|
|
|
ytmikelol commented on 11 Year Old Ron Paul Supporter Says CNN ' Full of Crap '
|
|
Channel Comments


















































the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer
and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense." (State v.
Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as
he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus
it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an
officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without
resistance." (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in
defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and
battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
However, I still really think, besides basic police weapons (mace, batons, & tasers) what makes them special besides their massively gigantic balls?
I agree with most of what you said about the security but would suggest two things.
1. No security checks or proceedures may violate ANY GOD GIVEN HUMAN RIGHT. So, if the government wants to waste its time doing security at the airport, okay, but no searches, no seizures, and no BS questioning that may violate my rights in any way.
2. Since you understand 9/11 was an inside job, you would understand that the people doing the security ARE the terrorists, or at least run by the terrorists. That being said, there is no more of a threat at the airports than there are at apartment building parking garages. If a nut, religious zelot, abortion activist, or flat out crazy "Friday the 13th" wacko wants to kill a couple of hundred people in a firery explosion, you don't need a plane. Aside from locking the cockpit door, nothing more needs to be done, or even makes sense, as far as security goes.
Cheers
Thought i would just say hey. Hope you're having a Great summer!
Lisa