You will LOVE my channel :) Excellent work friend.

make a video about fox bronte and richard coughlan. both assholes, both atheists, both british.

Actually, Abraham and Issac was a foreshadowing of what the Father was going to do to His Son. The only difference is that He did kill Jesus for us.....the lamb of God. Have a great day.

You say that we can't defend evolution. Would you like to have a debate about evolution so i can prove you wrong.

younhol00 you are a dumb person get your head out of your bible

Epicurus had his riddle: "Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked. If God can abolish evil, and God really wants to do it, why is there evil in the world?"

You could help me out by explaining why God sanctions Rape, War, Genocide, Infanticide etc. You could also help me out by explaining why the word of God contradicts itself on how Judas actually died or what Jesus said on the cross.

You don't seem to want to listen. People keep trying to explain to you that atheism does not require evidence. Lack of a belief in something does not require evidence. You won't get an answer because your question is inherently flawed. People have tried to explain this to you but you simply shut your ears off and refuse to listen. It does not require proof to be a skeptic. Prove to me that Zeus does not exist? Oh you can't do that? Then you're not an atheist with respect to Zeus. You believe in Zeus. See how silly that is?

You're not listening to anyone and that's why you'll never understand.

The absurdity of being asked to prove a negative is demonstrated in Bertrand Russell's teapot thought experiment - where no matter how hard you look, you can't thoroughly disprove the theory that a teapot is out there in space, orbiting the sun somewhere between Earth and Mars. This sort of presuppositional thinking is illogical, so asking an atheist to disprove God is an unreasonable request.Now, imagine if someone were to walk up to you randomly and say to you "I can fly" you would automatically say "No you can't, prove that you can fly". Then just like many of the theist out there, the guy says "no you must prove that I cannot fly, and if you cant, then obviously i can fly! HAHAHAHA" see how absurd that is?

The burden of proof relies on the one making the outrageous and extraordinary claims (I.E. a god exist) not the atheist due to the fact that atheism is the denial of gods due to lack of evidence from the theistic side. Assuming that God exists is known as presuppositionalism and has always been a key tenet of Christian apologetics but is usually rejected by more sensible scholars.