@urBabygirl123 She wasn't. There would be obvious scarring if a six year old girl had been repeatedly raped (which also implies that it would have started when she was even younger and smaller). It is believed that there was digital penetration, with the general consensus being, that it occurred ...
@urBabygirl123 She wasn't. There would be obvious scarring if a six year old girl had been repeatedly raped (which also implies that it would have started when she was even younger and smaller). It is believed that there was digital penetration, with the general consensus being, that it occurred ...