warnford's channel

excellent - it reallly IS like this

I agree with the conclusion - it is a pretty good starter for helping someone find an eigen value. I thought the sound was clear - perhaps a little slower would be good.

There was a defined field to write in and you kept within it

The lighting was low but I certainly wouldnt say - spooky

credita...

funnily enough I was at secondary school in UK in 1968

and I completely agree with free-from-influence

well done Gabriella for badgering her husband to make this available

Many thanks Professor Herb. I thought the course was great.

I particularly like your tmt of convergence because it isnt normally taught before calc 2 etc,

and it was good to get a first bite at the cherry.

Also as ever very clearly done.

Many thanks - Oliver Dearlove

v clear as ever

thanks

sublime in the extreme

I am thankful that he was recognised as someone to film in the 70s

and also thankful to Gabriella for providing the wherewithal for us to see it

yes.......what ? let rip

or divide into areas and call negative positive to avoid underestimation

I suppose that should be yes which ?

thanks for the viddies anyway

suppose g(x) in your first example dips below the x axis

do you have to vary anything ?

excellent, like v much

thanks

These videos are Great ! and the comments ! [ honestly men can be bit**es ]

This was a part question in Cambridge Schol, 1968 - q2. b. explain why beer may be brown but the head may be white.

although I have read Rolle's theorem myself, I welcome this leture on the subject

as an excellent explanation

excellent lecture - can stand repeated viewing

I clearly was unconscious when I watched Unit 2 Lecture 2 where the k.dx is extensively treated over the next 15 mins, and how it goes to 0 quicker than dx. I hang my head in shame

very clear thanks

very clear - actually the hard to read writing [writing skills seem not to be taught in American schools] makes the student concentrate on the speech.

which is kinda what's needed in something like this

really good

thanks Mr Gonzo

I should slap a few more of your class quite honestly

did not Bishop Butler say, let us call a thing a thing and not another thing ?

it isnt too subtle to say that he said dot products were associative and then chalked up a relation which erm wasnt associative.

I mean come on shades of that guy who couldnt name the third department he wanted to close

excellent thank you

wonderful

exxaxctly as my maths teacher Fatty Barrett of Beaminster School taught me in 1968.

last identity

simplest is one over half sin (2theta)

or two over sin (2theta)

isnt it