universephotons's channel

@dkman2006 WLC understands a second rendition of inifinity as applied to a timeless being, namely: qualitative summary of all the attributes ascribebable to the divine. This goes beyond the conceptual, abstact form. By the way, when debaters use 'infinity' they generally try to smuggle it from th...

@jefersontorres Just take a look up at ebeatworld's comments above. If not, have a look on Google or on youtube. I know Wikipedia is not the best but it can be a start. You will find that it is common knowledge that there is no 100% vacuum.

@universephotons Did you notice your mistake about what science is? You gave me permission to convert you but did not answer my questions about your moral condition. It is this deliberate hardheartedness that blinds people to God.

The evidence you insist on having you have shut you eyes to. All a...

@coolgreyoneabby Notice that I quoted what he actually said!: 'quantum principle'.

@lamuziq Thanks, great brother.

@ogirv101 And the fossil record has irreconcilable gaps. Add that to the absence of living intermediates and you have a break down in evolutionary theory.

@ogirv101 A problem I see, maybe someone can elucidate: unless the other universes next to each other there will be space between them. If you put several balls together there is space where they do not touch. But space cannot exist outside a universe, can it?

@Greyclouds40 You must be kidding! We are talking about new info that changes the organism from one thing into another. That has never been observed! You can dig up all the scientific literature in the world. Evolution is a faith-claim, not observable science.

@FourDeuce01 No need for sarcasm. Why?

@Christianjr4 You said!

A pre-existing law that, according Dr De Sousa, causes 'auto-creation' or self-creation admits the existence of 'laws', but laws are not nothing. That idea would confirm that the origin of all is laws, or Word. But that is intelligence. What else will you call it?