tomaselvis's channel

tomaselvis commented 10 hours ago

4:52 Add to

America's Most Oblivious Theophile: S. E. Cupp

http://www.nydailynews.com/...

http://www.centerforinq...

45,053 views

tomaselvis said:

@svvmichael1

Wow! You win.

I have nothing against that argument.

• tomaselvis commented 10 hours ago

  tomaselvis said:

  @masanf

  Compared to her, we all are...

• tomaselvis commented 2 days ago

  tomaselvis said:

  She's not that bright...

• tomaselvis liked 2 days ago

+ One more: Commented, Commented, Likedshow less

tomaselvis commented 10 hours ago

2:58 Add to

Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

http://www.youtube.com/watc......

317,491 views

tomaselvis said:

@1GodOnlyOne

In your head.

Meanwhile in reality...

• tomaselvis commented 2 days ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @983215ljhlkadbspig6y

  And then he points to the christian god.

  Surprise surprise!

• tomaselvis commented 2 days ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @JMorde999

  So if Stalin said 1+1=2 then it's wrong?

  The statement is true regardless of who said it.

• tomaselvis commented 2 days ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  Science can't "prove" anything by definition. So Graig fails utterly.

  But anything can be examined by the scientific method.

  Or as Satoshi Kanazawa said:

  "Anyone who uses the words “proof,” “prove” and “proven” in their discussion of science is not a real scientist."

• tomaselvis commented 1 week ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @synal

  No, he's not wrong. Science has never "proven" anything.

  Only amateurs use the word proven when talking in scientific matters.

  Science builds explanations. You think emotions are unexplainable?

  Craig does.

• tomaselvis commented 2 weeks ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @synal

  So you can't answer the question?

  Why do you even continue debating then?

  Define what Craig means by "proving math" or accept the failure.

• tomaselvis commented 2 weeks ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @CheckHooKz

  What do you mean "accounted for"?

• tomaselvis commented 2 weeks ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @synal

  Ok, let's turn around the question.

  What part of math can't or needs to be proven?

  What is this "proof" he is talking about?

  Does he talk about mathematical proof? Then it's there.

  Does he talk about scientific proof? There is no scientific proof of anything.

  Only models that describe nat...

+ View allshow less

tomaselvis commented 2 weeks ago

5:26 Add to

Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. John Shook

Dr. William Lane Craig exposes the logical fails within this common atheist argument.

31,819 views

tomaselvis said:

@lokenath123

I totally agree with you.

• 5:26 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. John Shook

  Dr. William Lane Craig exposes the logical fails within this common atheist argument.

  31,819 views

  tomaselvis said:

  This is Craigs argument:

  My LOUSY arguments for the existence of unicorns do not prove them NOT existing.

  Just because I'm bad at explaining it doesn't disprove them.

  This is Craigs best argument...

• 5:26 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. John Shook

  Dr. William Lane Craig exposes the logical fails within this common atheist argument.

  31,819 views

  tomaselvis said:

  Craig says nature and the supernatural exists. John says nature exist and that Craigs arguments for supernatural are weak. It doesn't prove that there is no supernatural. It just proves that Craigs argument are weak. And they are. Craig is grasping for straws.

  I doubt that people writing this ti...

• 7:49 Add to

  4 Fantastic Feats of Creation Science!!!

  4,828 views

  tomaselvis said:

  Prove it or be quiet.

+ One more videoshow less

tomaselvis commented 2 weeks ago

2:58 Add to

Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

http://www.youtube.com/watc......

317,491 views

tomaselvis said:

@synal

No, it's irrelevant to use the scientific method on a definition we make. It's pointless.

We already know about it since we made it. What is there to "prove"?

Science describes natural phenomena. Math can be described as that. No prob.

Objective morality does not exist. I analyse society...

• tomaselvis commented 2 weeks ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  @synal

  Yes science or the scientific method can be used on everything in the world.

  Math is a definition and irrelevant to "prove".

  There are no moral truths. And yes science can account for how moral works.

  It's a social set of rules with benefits. Read the research about it.

  Craig is dead wrong.

• tomaselvis commented 3 weeks ago

  2:58 Add to

  Dr. William Lane Craig humiliates Dr. Peter Atkins

  This is taken from the 1998 debate between Craig and Atkins. You can see the full debate here:

  http://www.youtube.com/watc......

  317,491 views

  tomaselvis said:

  Science doesn't prove anything. Science builds models to explain natural phenomena.

  In math and logic things can be proven.

  Mr Craig fail utterly on this one as he thinks science proves stuff.

  He uses the word completely in a false way.

+ View allshow less

tomaselvis commented 3 weeks ago

7:24 Add to

Christopher Hitchens vs Kim Jong Il

After the despicable gloating over Hitchens corpse I wonder if Christians could forgive Kim Jong Il if he had a death bed conversion.

According ...

15,368 views

tomaselvis said:

@Atheeizm :-(

It's great fun looking at old clips of him.

The poetry of his words... :-)

• tomaselvis commented 3 weeks ago

  tomaselvis said:

  I miss the old bugger...

• tomaselvis liked 3 weeks ago

+ One more: Commented, Likedshow less