Yes, I'm well aware of what Pascal's Wager is. Just because I'm 18 does not necessarily mean I'm uninformed, I base my beliefs on scientific facts and well-established theories, not blind faith.

Wow Tony ... I am speechless! I can't believe you wrote me such a beautiful poem! That was so sweet of you! Thank you so much! I sent you a friend invite, I hope you accept it! ;o)
joann

Pardon me for asking, but I still don't find anything wrong with my previous statement. Yes, The Bible asked Noah to bring two of each animal aboard the Ark, which is impossible as 16 billion species on.

Noah's Ark was taller than a 3-story building and had a deck area the size of 36 lawn tennis courts. Its length was 300 cubits (450 feet, or 135 meters); its width was 50 cubits (75 feet, or 22.5 meters); it had three stories and its height was 30 cubits (45 feet, or 13.5 meters). Even Titanic was bigger than that, and Titanic could only contain approximately 3500 passengers.

Two of each "kind".

Once again you have shown your biblical ignorance. Hint: Purchase a biblical concordance, as the bible was not written in English originally. You should know this Patrick. I find your condescending language typical of someone your age. It's okay to have your adolescent insecurities. Don't think that you have "know" everything. Just be comfortable in your own skin. I'll still like you regardless. Take care.

Hint: keep your arguments short, summarized and simple. Typing out 50 sentences in 20 posts is just gonna get you ignored as I have better things to do than spend hours reading.

The Bible clearly states that two each animal should be brought on the Ark.

(Genesis 6:19-20) - "And of every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two of every kind into the ark, to keep them alive with you; they shall be male and female. 20Of the birds after their kind, and of the animals after their kind, of every creeping thing of the ground after its kind, two of every kind will come to you to keep them alive."

YOU ARE AWESOME!!!♥--Hugz and Parmesan--♥ Brittani aka Rhonda :)

Hey that's cool, maybe you're a puppet for Santa and the Easter bunny, you just don't know yet!

lisabob22

Thanks for the reply.

I always appreciate a civil, calm discussion on topics that are quite heated to begin

with.

I've watched electrical fires that burned much longer than twenty minutes and in

areas with significantly much less square feet.

I've used convection ovens to heat materials in excess of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit

because that is the function of such an oven. Circulating, heated air that rapidly

raises the internal temperature of the 'enclosed' area. Simply put, the remaining

steel structure weakened and became malleable, giving way to the structure above.

This explains why the South tower listed to one side, in the direction of the first

impact and not any other direction. The North tower, in similar fashion, descending

from the top, beginning at impact site and then collapsing completely down to the

foundation.

The incoming aircraft did more than just create the infernal environment I just

described, they (planes) also destroyed a significant portion of the steel-skeletal

structure designed to support its upper steel frame. Besides the malleability of steel

when heated continuously, WTC architects designed the towers as "tubes within a

tube" to resist lateral and horizontal forces. The benefit being that in the event of a

tower collapse, the tower(s) would primarily collapse "in on itself", minimizing

collateral damage to surrounding structures.