sweetmikser's Channel

264 subscribers

293,815 video views

Play All

Uploaded videos

1-10 of 126

Armageddon has Jehovah's signature on it - sweetmikser 328 views Circuit Assembly of Jehovah's Witnesses, in December 2011 Queens New York. "Let Your Name Be Sanctified". Elder giving sermon on the Lord's Judgment and War, and how Bibl...
"RNA World Hypothesis" - a list of 12 problems ..... (that Atheists don't like to discuss) sweetmikser 374 views A list of some of the SCIENTIFIC problems that make this desperate Atheist talking point and appeal totally unworkable, untenable, and even laughable. RNA itself is actu...
FINAL REBUTTAL - Atheist's Head Explodes (Full Version) sweetmikser 377 views The thorough rebuttal video to the so-called rebuttal Atheist video...to the first Theist video to make "an Atheist's head explode". Each statement and silly belch of thi...
Atheist's head explode "cause and effect" (final) ............abbreviated sweetmikser 80 views abbreviated version of the 31 minute video
Atheist's Head Explode 2 - "Big Bang"? sweetmikser 83 views the 2nd part of full version....
Atheist's Head Explode 2 - "cause & effect" sweetmikser 52 views Broken in two parts...Part 1 of the 31-minute Rebuttal Video -Part Two.... The thorough rebuttal video to the so-called rebuttal Atheist video...to the first Theist video...
"New Earth" - Revelation 21 sweetmikser 122 views See an amazing Biblical, Textual, and Pictorial description of the Messiah's New Earth and Paradise Restored...brought about by His Blood and Kingdom. With Heavenly and S...
"RNA World hypothesis" - another desperate Atheist myth and speculation sweetmikser 172 views when told that enzymes are needed to form proteins, and living molecules, the die-hard Atheist and Darwinist desperately claims that "RNA" acted as enzymes, and uh "Chech" ...
Will Humans Ruin the Earth? abortions and other corruptions will end by God sweetmikser 367 views The Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses District Convention. 2011. New York. The late morning Public Discourse..."Will Humans Ruin This Earth?" In the "Let Your ...
elderly woman gets baptized as Jehovah's witness sweetmikser 341 views in the District Convention of Jehovah's Witnesses, 2011, "Let Your Kingdom Come!" an older woman becomes a baptized and dedicated disciple of Christ and a witness of the Lord.

About sweetmikser's channel

myspace.com/thegabbypost

Created by

sweetmikser

Latest Activity

Feb 1, 2012

Date Joined

Mar 2, 2008

About this user

After working for some time, gathering data, from ALL sides—Atheistic Darwinism, Theistic Evolution, Theistic Direct Creation (Old Earth and Young Earth), etc—I ended up with what was basically a shopping list of the processes, postulations, thoughts, and ideas of Life Origins, Reality, and Science, and Knowledge, in the different positions. Much of the data were disorganized and made very little sense. So obviously there's some collation and sorting.

I also think it is necessary to de-mystify the scientific process somewhat. Too often we fetishize scientific discoveries, offering blind faith to ideas, such as "Big Bang," "A-biogenesis," "Beneficial Mutations," and "Common Ape-Man Ancestor," and in Darwinian Evolution theory, that we find it difficult to truly inquire into or fully understand or make total sense of. And this applies to even just more neutral things like "Photo-synthesis" and "Gravity" also. Many of us regard "science" as a definite body of knowledge—as if it were a place whose boundary and geography were well known and easily ascertained. In fact, it is a province whose vast unknown territories are filled in only a little at a time. Guesses are made, conclusions drawn, and regions penciled or keyed in accordingly, only to be many times erased or written over later.

"Scientists" rely as much on creative intuition as any artist does—the difference is that the true and honest scientist conscientiously and carefully attempts to disprove or validate his or her insight by the most stringent tests imaginable. That's if we are TRUE objective scientists. Which I have found that many committed and devout Neo-Darwinists ARE NOT.....at least in certain areas.

Again, what is the "Inductive Scientific Method"?

ok

"TEST the hypotheses and choose the best one," was it?

And,

"examine carefully and thoroughly all true available evidence, and then draw unbiased conclusions therefrom," right?

And not allow emotion, bias, or arrogance (from whatever side) to interfere and cloud or disrupt true objective analysis. (sighs)

Anyway, I was able to finally see many connections among the different major theories and philosophies. Because of fair and careful examination and a great deal of work and research, I had discovered processes and facts that could account for what's really going on now and what has gone on before, and how it must have all happened, though obviously not totally understandable or appreciated.

The honest research into all fields and disciplines and studies will lead to the honest and objective conclusion: Old Earth Biblical Direct Creation over spans of time with natural and allowable and even necessary variations and adaptations.

That's if a person will be truly fair, objective, careful, thorough, and honest.

At least as fair and honest as a person can try to be. It's not perfect, given human nature propensities and problems. People generally believe what they WANT to believe, not necessarily or really what the honest evidence truly points to or at least strongly implies. People are bias-prone and emotional, for the most part. But the hard inescapable fact is that Design WITHOUT an Intelligent and Deliberate Designer does NOT make honest mathematical or scientific sense. Nor is it logical or rational.

The simplest protein molecule has 288 things in it, from which twelve amino acids can produce ten to the 300th power (10 with about 300 "zeros" after it) "isomers" of different protein structures. They must be organized into the right systems, and be PROTECTED while doing it. DESIGN is so apparent in the lowest protein molecules as to exclude any thought about chance or accident.

And it is simply inconsistent and flaky when Atheists or Darwinists try to claim that it's "not random", yet with no Intelligent Direction. No Deliberate Design. They are speaking out of BOTH SIDES OF THEIR MOUTHS when it comes to "chance" or "randomness". Because they obviously want to have it BOTH WAYS.

Because if it was not "random" then what was it? Was there a Deliberate Hand? Was it PLANNED BY AN OUTSIDE INTELLIGENCE???

According to committed hard-core Atheists, and Darwinists, there simply was NOT a Deliberate Mind and Hand doing it intelligentally or intentionally. In ANY sense.

So if not Intentional and Deliberate, then how logically was it NOT "random" or "chance"? The equivocation and duplicity are all over the place here. Maybe "constrained accidents"? "Nature done it"? Or "lawful accients" or "randomness within parameters"? Again, the duplicity. Wanting to somehow deny that it was "chance" because they know that "chance materialism" does not really sound all that scientific or even very nice.

Yet there've been a number of Atheists who themselves used the words "random", "chance" and "accidents" in explaining the supposed origin of life and the "evoluiton of man". Frankly, Atheistic Darwinism is MASS DOUBLE-TALK AND CONFUSION.

Age

Country

United States

less

Featured Playlists

126 videos Play all(126) Uploaded videos by sweetmikser's channel