sirrahusa's channel

@sonofmabarker Thanks a lot. Unfortunately that crater is just a bit off the area covered by the NAC (Narrow Angle Camera) so the image of it is inconclusive.

@warpcrafter Hyperlinks aren't allowed in Youtube comments but I've already guided bonzelite to a blog page.

In summary: The X-37B (not XB37 as Hoagland said it) cannot reach the Moon. It is totally untrue that the Lunar atmospheric pressure has increased 100x. The Apollo measurement was nightti...

Quote: "This represents the first time NASA has had to grapple with the question WHAT IS LIFE?"

Oh yeah??? What does he think all those biologists were doing back in 1975/6 as they designed THREE SEPARATE experiments to test for life on the Viking Mars-landers?

Hoagland is an uneducated flim-fl...

Hoagland blunders 14 minutes in:

It's called X-37B, not XB37.

It's not capable of going to the Moon.

The Indian experiment measured DAYTIME atmospheric pressure, whereas the Apollo instruments were nighttime only. VERY BIG DIFFERENCE. The 100x factor is a little surprising but you cannot say tha...

@0McCroft0 If they're "airbrushed out" then by definition you can't see them. SO HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY'RE GEOMETRICAL??

No, he pulls his "information" out of his ass. He says whatever he thinks will get him attention and help to sell his books and videos. He's a fake, an impostor, a liar.

Hoagland says the chance of a comet having a given inclination is 360 divided by the inclination. Well, HELLO???? What happens if the inclination is zero, please??

The man is totally incompetent and untrained in physics/astronomy.

"Dark Mission" is full of factual errors. Google for the 'Emoluments of Mars' blog and read the 24 sept 2009 post for a point-by-point critique.

Mike Bara is totally unqualified to talk or write about physics and astronomy. He has no training in either discipline and makes laughable mistakes every time he tries -- like, e.g. "annular eclipses occur when the moon is unusually CLOSE TO Earth." Duhhhhhh

In a promotional interview for "The Choice," Mike Bara boasted "I'm completely confident I can prove that there's no such thing as the laws of physics." Ha-ha. What he's proved instead is that there's no such thing as his comprehension of those laws.

What a bunch of poppycock. Google for the 'Emoluments of Mars' blog and read the entry for 29 nov 2011 for a review of this nonsense.

Funny how Bara & Hoagland accuse NASA of a cover-up, and as evidence they cite photographs that are FREELY AVAILABLE ON NASA HISTORY WEB SITES. Duuhhhhh....

Hoagland is completely wrong about everything. Links aren't allowed here, but google for the blog 'emoluments of mars' then read the entry for 24 sept 2009 for a point by point refutation of Dark Mission.

Mike Bara knows nothing about physics.

Mike Bara is a liar.

@kolajampe : When he was asked about this on FB he replied "Have you ever heard the expression 'Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds'?" In other word, he's NOT a scientist or even a logical thinker. He's just rubbish, really.

@TheBluemnky13 - officially 21° 18′ 32″ N, 157° 49′ 34″ W

@MarcosElf - I'll give you one quick proof. If the probability of an inclination is derived by diving the inclination into 360, as RCH says, it follows that greater inclinations are more probable than smaller ones. What we actually observe is that all inclinations are equally probable. Ergo the f...

@sirrahusa Sorry - wrote that the wrong way. I meant Simone did not interrupt Hoagland.