sethdbeebe's channel

@Requiemxtoxinnocence ...they rejected their Messiah just as they rejected most of the other prophets that Yahweh sent them...Jeremiah, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, Joel, Hosea - all rejected by their own people. Jesus, the Son of God, would be the ultimate rejection - crucified, yet in yahweh's divi...

@SuperMemzzz The problem with arguing it for Christian theism, I think????, is that it has a further proposed revelation from God beyond the natural one, which explains that it is necessary to help others understand what is true in the world. In a purely matterial world, there is absolutely noth...

@scepticthinktank sorry, I meant to finish by saying, I would encourage you as Craig encouraged Hitchens at the end, and a Lee Strobel did for two years, to investigate the evidence that is there, ask all of the difficult questions of the N.T. as you read it and compare it to the other historical...

@shortfuse41 This is the Christian book expo buddy isn't it! lol

So in conclusion Craig has given us a knockdown argument for 1. a good explanation for 2. and a plausible explanation for 3. and Law has just said, I'm a skeptic the evidence that we do have is not enough YET! So rather than base his current views on the EVIDENCE that we have, he bases on EVID...

@GuillemotWatcher You are assuming your definition of "rational". Reason/rationality has everything to do with logic. You assume a person is irrational if there evidence leads them beyond the natural realm. Tell me why they are irrational and give some reasons or this is just a biased claim (a...

@Batters56 Science cannot explain these realms of reality. In fact science cannot be done unless we presuppose reasoning and the ability of our minds to reason in a proper or good way. We use our minds to come to the conclusions of the data we gather in our scientific experiments, but what if o...

@Futureplanet thanks for the reply. In deductive logical reasoning the conclusion that one comes to is not a premise. For instance one of craigs argument is Premise 1 - Whatever has a beginning has a cause Premise 2. The Universe had a beginning Conclusion - The Universe has a cause Then Cra...

@ToadsMGodes Hey man, nice to hear your thoughts. I'm sorry but I don't know what I said that was funny. I was trying to be serious. Were you laughing because what I said seemed ridiculous. Which statement then? and if you laughed because I said something funny, thanks, but i wasn't trying ...

If God wrote, "I am here" in the stars than that would be evidence. So any kind of order in the universe instead of what seems random, would be evidence for God. Well, we see order everywhere in the Universe, so thank you Krauss for proving that God exists.

Someone, please just answer this question for me? If we all believe there are objective moral values, real good and real evil that apply to everyone, everywhere, at all times, cultures, etc. then how do we know that?

I just don't understand why Harris doesn't try to wrestle with Craigs points. Craig hasn't once argued in the whole debate for the existence of the God of the Bible. He hasn't argued for the existence of God either. He just says, IF there was a god, then it gives a basis for objective morality...

Sam Harris is not dealing with Craig's Argument. He is now building a straw man for what he thinks Christian theology teaches. He is trying to explain Christian Theology and is not doing a very good job of it.