rkg62976's channel

@MrsEJM said, "all mankind *can* be saved". See the *potentiality* in your statement.

Your doctrine of atonement:

1) Christ's death provided *opportunity* for salvation; it didn't *actually* save anyone apart from their "free will" decision to repent and believe.

2) Christ's Divine, Atoning...

@paulojose1955 Those who deny a pre-trib. rapture (like myself), and claim that the rapture and 2nd Advent are the same event (like myself), do not assert that God's people will be killed at the 2nd Advent/rapture. In fact, we assert that God's people will not be subject to His wrath (the 7 last...

@jakehjk3 I would recommend that anyone seeking to refute the fallacies of dispensational futurism must begin at Dan.9:24-27, for it is here that the entire dispensational futurist eschatological system [of error] makes its gravest mistakes. Learn the truthful interpretation of this passages, an...

@heeminhyman Yes, unbiblical in the fact that the video is presenting Christ's atoning work as universal in intention.

I submit to you that Christ did not die to make it "possible" for people to be saved; He died to *actually* secure the salvation of His people: the doctrine of *Definite Atonem...

Why do synergists (Arminians and others) constantly presume that:

1) An imperative mood of speech implies ability? An imperative is merely a command of what man 'ought to do', it does not imply what man has 'the ability to do'.

2) "Free will", and/or, "ability" are prerequisites for "responsib...

@guardafango1 I totally accept your apology, my friend. I know that when futurists hear an opposing viewpoint, sometimes they just assume the other person is a preterist. The Reformers who wrote treatises on Bible prophecy during, and after the Reformation were neither futurist, or preterist......

Please give the specific reference. You're the one who made the accusation, you give the reference:

1) Video Title, and, 2) Specific time the statement was made (A direct quotation would be proper since, again, it was YOU who made the accusation).

Unlike some of the absolute childish, and immature responses from people below, and above, I would like to say that I am proud of every one of these students for taking the time to attempt to provide some meaningful, substantive argumentation based upon research (even if one disagree with their c...

And notice the bad (Arminian) analogy of a "drowning man in the middle of the ocean" (@5:05)? This terrible analogy assumes:

1) That the drowning man WANTS to be saved, and is crying out for it.

2) That the drowning man may, or may not be responsible for his own predicament (biblical truth a...

Basic mistake in synergistic (Arminian) thought:

1) They don't have a proper definition of "responsibility" ("accountability");

2) They believe that "free will" is a prerequisite of responsibility. It most assuredly is NOT!; and,

3) They constantly, but consistently, confuse imperative state...

@tercelkisor I agree that God's sovereignty does not cancel out human responsibility. But, I was wondering, what do you mean by "hyper-calvinism"? Are you referring to the historic definition of hyper-calvinism?

Rob Bell is simply the liberal, false teacher, and the instrumental BACKLASH to the erroneous doctrine of the inherent immortality of the soul. It is this false doctrine that leads most Protestants to the idea that the wicked will burn in the lake of fire throughout the ceaseless ages of eternit...

Wow! What an amazingly ignorant presentation of the historical nature of Reformed theology. I have only heard this ignorance from synergists who are so enmeshed with their traditions that they cannot understand the biblical polemic against fallen mankind.

About "hell": The Bible is clear rega...

Rob Bell: "I tell people to trust their lives to Jesus".

Re: That's not the point, Mr. Bell! One can have the best-tasting, tropical punch; but if you take a poop in the punch-bowl, the entire beverage becomes BAD!

The church is told to steer clear from false teachers! Christians should ...

1) The interviewer constantly engages in "begging the question" when he consistently makes a statement, and then follows with "that' true isn't it?".

2) The Bible is very clear about: a) the state of the dead, and what happens when a person (believer or unbeliever) dies; and, b) What/where/whe...

@guardafango1 Rev.7:9 "After this, I looked..."

Q. After what?

A. The antecedent situation, where John "heard" the number (144,000).

Q. Are the 144,000 (vs.4-8), and the "great multitude" of v.9, the same group? Or, are they different groups.

A. The word "after" (v.9), is Μετὰ, (meta-- a pr...

@777 I am NOT a preterist! Nor am I a futurist! These are both erroneous systems of interpretation, brought about by two different Jesuit theologians during the time of the Reformation in order to overthrow the historic, Protestant teaching on Bible prophecy. Sadly, many Evangelicals are follow...