I am passionate about my own opinions and will argue for them but I do believe in objective truth and focsing on arguments not opinions, and therefore care for what can be prooven and will admitt I am wrong if I have no arguments. I think many critics are to selfconfident and I believe in achieving objectivity and I believe in listening to others, debating, support questioning and want to admit it when I am wrong so I am opewn to any debate and I will never block people use argumentum ad populum or say it is opinion. This certainly doesn`t mean I won`t still often disagree but I won`t always and it depends on whether someone can proof me wrong and whether I can counter argue.

I am willing to take requests for review:

I believe in objectivity and want to learn from viewers, am open to debate and want to admit being wrong when someone can argue I am. I also want to focus more on my viewers to serve an audience. This doesn`t mean I think I will automaticly agree with someone or anyone or say whatever people want, but I will when they have demonstratable arguments, out of a believe in objectivity. Therefore when I get a request people can first inform on what they think of the film to check whether they still want to do it, and if we disagree and they have good arguments I will support their views. But because I don`t want to ripoff I only want some basic thoughts. This also aplies to debating existing videos. But I repeat if you can`t proof your points I might stil disagree.

Planned reviews:
Finding Nemo
Toy Story 3

I am a lover of films and reviews, and am trying to become professional reviewer. I am a huge defender of the Star Wars prequels and George Lucas. I also think Gary Kurtz is a terrible liar. I will never get hostile or insult others personally, even when they insult me. I love cats and nature and everything that is soft and innocent, kinda like Anakin.

I just wanted to mention that anyone claiming the orginal trilogy was great because Lucas had less control is wrong. Lucas owned the righs to the franchise from the beginning and made a great deal with the studio through Alan Ladd Junior. He solely wrote and directed A New Hope, and there are no reports of him being challenged, except for claims by Kurtz,who seems to be an obvious liar. Most of the crew didn`t believe in the project and Lucas was even a control freak back then, so as Kurtz' boss he would never allow him to challenge him. Also people who say Empire was great because Lucas wasn`t involved should check the web. He was both co-screenwriter and co-director, uncredited, demonstrating how humble he was. Also he was creative supervisor, and upperleader, production overseer, and both Kasdan and Kirshner only served as substitutes, and were only there to do stuff in his place. Same with Jedi. All Marquand and Kasdan did was a small part of writing and directing, but they were doing this based on Lucas story, and under his strict supervision, and he interfered a lot, and gave many instructions. Also he was executive producer of all 3 films, so don`t act like they weren`t almost as much the result of him as the prequels. They were and he was responsible for their succes, and anyone who wants to say Kurtz told Lucas no, I would like to repeat that Lucas could just shut him up, and he already back then would do that, cause he was control obsessed.