pointyhead1's channel

Failing to provide even a single paper that says we are at a dangerous level, we can agree, I would suppose, in saying Hansen "exaggerated" the case about the science. Nobody says that in science ( not even Hansen ).

AronRa,

Therefore I see both Creationist and you, as using the "it never stops being that basic kind of thing that it is and always was" argument.

So although it's true that many Creationists would even deny that humans are animals ( maybe even while admitting we are mammals )- that's not t...

Hi Zak,

I appreciate the "spirit" that your dogs display...the eagerness - and your understanding.

Re: your criticisms of Cesar M's notions...your ideas could be the more important regarding the dog pack notion vs. human/dog behavioral/signal integration .

However, I found SOME of Cesar's body...

Gary !

"Beat me !", said the masochist.

"No", said the sadist

@genettej ... yes, chopped off and hid what they did, starting with main public presentation of the trick in Jones WMO1999. going forward...the hiding became slightly more sophisticated over time.

@logicallunatic1 "Dawkins got it wrong on that one instance and yes it shouldn't be printed." Should NEVER have been accepted. How about REPRINTED ?

Anyone can make errors. This is an error in method. And accountability.

Ray Comfort with his banana and Richard Dawkins with his Penguins.

Which ...

when I check definitions, I find that information is knowledge gained or transmitted, once again.

Data: factual information.

so it always comes down to sender / recipient.

who is the sender of DNA information/data/code ?

Surely anything has patterns, but only as observed