The guy forgets the already existing $2.17 trillion in mildly overlapping federal revenues, so really he should've either stopped around draining >$250k earners or extended this over 3 similar budget years. But his analogy is pretty good, nonetheless.
The guy forgets the already existing $2.17 trillion in mildly overlapping federal revenues, so really he should've either stopped around draining >$250k earners or extended this over 3 similar budget years. But his analogy is pretty good, nonetheless.