philosophicalreason's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
 
What is Philosophy?
 
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
philosophicalreason
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Channel Views:
1,075
Total Upload Views:
0
Age:
47
Joined:
Sep 1, 2011
Latest Activity:
Sep 1, 2011
Subscribers:
3
About Me:
 
Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Rorty, and a number of other philosophers have contributed to a debate about what reason means, or ought to mean. Some, like Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Rorty, are skeptical about subject-centred, universal, or instrumental reason, and even skeptical toward reason as a whole. Others, including Hegel, believe that it has obscured the importance of intersubjectivity, or "spirit" in human life, and attempt to reconstruct a model of what reason should be.
Some thinkers, e.g. Foucault, believe there are other forms of reason, neglected but essential to modern life, and to our understanding of what it means to live a life according to reason. In the last several decades, a number of proposals have been made to "re-orient" this critique of reason, or to recognize the "other voices" or "new departments" of reason:
Nikolas Kompridis has proposed a widely encompassing view of reason as "that ensemble of practices that contributes to the opening and preserving of openness" in human affairs, and a focus on reason's possibilities for social change.
The philosopher Charles Taylor, influenced by the 20th century German philosopher Martin Heidegger, has proposed that reason ought to include the faculty of disclosure, which is tied to the way we make sense of things in everyday life, as a new "department" of reason.
In the essay "What is Enlightenment?", Michel Foucault proposed a concept of critique based on Kant's distinction between "private" and "public" uses of reason. This distinction, as suggested, has two dimensions:
Private reason is the reason that is used when an individual is "a cog in a machine" or when one "has a role to play in society and jobs to do: to be a soldier, to have taxes to pay, to be in charge of a parish, to be a civil servant." Public reason is the reason used "when one is reasoning as a reasonable being (and not as a cog in a machine), when one is reasoning as a member of reasonable humanity." In these circumstances, "the use of reason must be free and public."
Country:
United States
Recent Activity  
There hasn't been any recent activity.
Channel Comments
allsaintsmonastery (2 weeks ago)
Quite right. Faith is not evidence. One of the tragedies in our world is that many people are persecuted, even killed, for the sake of "faith-based ideologies." We can have faith, but should be honest enough to admit that it not evidence of anything.
billzybobb (1 month ago)
Thanks for subbin', friend. Your $100 is on its way.
TheMudbrooker (1 month ago)
Welcome to Mudbrook, thanks for subscribing!
AtheistSongs (2 months ago)
Very cool....thanks for the shout out...and best wishes right back at you for a kick ass new year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AtheistSongs (3 months ago)
Your user name says it all!
MacNutz2 (4 months ago)
I know you aren't making videos but I will be around when you do. :) An interesting "About Me".
Eopyk (4 months ago)
Saw your comment on Friendough's video. Just thought I send a friend request.

All love and respect
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more