636

250

47

Apr 18, 2011

2 weeks ago

10

Reconquista

Portugal

At the moment it is disproving the quran it is easy work....just type anything about the religion of peace and you get threats of violence and death threats...BINGO.

School of Life.

at the moment it is YouTube.History is also one of my favourites and my image is a Mesapotainian clay model of a horse picture taken in The Louvre which is a good place to visit.If something is perfect there can not be another version of this perfect thing or the perfect something is by definition not perfect.For example someone has made 2 "perfect planets" and you buy a ticket to travel to the perfect planet ; which perfect planet do you travel to ?Now this really fucks up muslimes and they have no answer at all.Because islam is based on the theory that god is perfect and so is the Koran.Now how is it possible to have several versions of a perfect book ?...errr it ain'tSo therefore islam is based on a false foundations.Also in my research I even find out that even the very first koran known is a translation of a forgotten language not used today and this book has to be translated into the many versions of Arabic used today.This is probably why there is many different types of islamic interpretation.So to sum islam up it is a lot of confusion due to language errors and different interpretations of a LIE.

Dead Man with Johnny Depp Fitna commissioned by Geert Wilders Pat Condell video issues.

Most music is okay...very few dislikes

Islam : why it not a religion but a cult.Islam states that the Koran is the perfect words of god.Now this is not possibly true as the Koran is very different from the version given to the character called mohammed this is due to the way the Koran was collected together and transmitted through history.This is in answer to many muslims argument that I do not know the Koran because I have not read it in Arabic.It is very unlikely that anybody reads the Koran in Kufic script , Syro-Aramaic or Ḥijāzī which is the most likely language that the Koran was written in and there is some controversy about John Gilchrist's criticism of the Koran saying it is not possible that the Koran was written down until at least 150 years after the death of the supposed mohammed , but that is not my point , my point is that just due to translation errors the Koran is different and therefore by definition not perfect ; so how can it be the words of a god who is all knowing and able to do all things ? Quite simply it can not and furthermore there is many forms of Arabic and some Arabic words have 2 meanings.In addition to this the Koran was revealed in at least seven different readings and apparently according to some Islamic scholars the differences in the readings can be dismissed because you can recite the koranic material anyway you find easiest , which leads to more evidence to the impossibility of the Koran being correct and perfect as given to the so called mohammed and as islam claims.There is a very interesting book about forms of Arabic around at the time the Koran was supposed to have been written in , this Arabic style is Syro-Aramaic and Ḥijāzī. It is supposed to be so hard to understand that it is characterised by dots and lines to make it more legible , the book is by Christoph Luxenberg and he claims not unreasonably that the Koran was first written languages so ambiguous and inexplicable that it is impossible to decode , Which is what I believe.I am fairly certain that the original Koran is written in code & that no Koran is written or read in the original text.The Koran also has initials written into it that no muslims understand which in fact makes the Koran unreadable and undecipherable even for Arabic muslims.There are many instances where the Koran can be seen as a copy of the Bible. There are many stories that are identical to the Bible and even coins depicting apparently mohammed on one side and Jesus on the obverse and if the depictions on the coins are not supposed to be Jesus & mohammed ; so why were there not coins minted depicting mohammed ? He was supposed to be a great warrior ; there is coins from even earlier depicting other famous persons such a Julius Cesar , Alexander the Great and from the time of the koran Yazdegerd The Third.Is it because mohammed never existed that islam does not like images of mohammed being portrayed ? I do not know but it begs the question "Did he actually exist ?To conclude islam and muslims do not understand the Koran which is undecipherable and therefore not the word of a god who is able to do all things.Muslim scientists have created a time machine which can take an entire country back in time 1400 years...It is called Islam.