nomadewolf09's channel

@TheUpperClan

He didn't ruin it. He just made it gain a whole new level of awesome

'She said no. Should we still do it?'

The part where Peter grabs Brian's ears and vomits on his head is hilarious

A zebra a abanar o traseiro para o Bocas levanta-me sérias dúvidas em relação às suas preferências sexuais...

@finlandnomics

Unfortunately, you are right.

Can you kill all our polititians instead?

Bullets are cheaper.

Both ideas are good and work (in a pink world where there's no corruption...)

Government must regulate, AS NEEDED. (more corruption> more regultaion)

We can't spend everything, or there's no investment (=no economy)

But we can't save everything either or there's no growth (=no economy, also)

...

You DO make some VALID points.

However, someone who believes that a plane hits the world trade center and brings it down. Then, the same kind of plane, falls on top (ok, maybe it 'just' hits it. still...) of the pentagon and leaves only a 3m wide whole...

Dude, get me whatever you're smoking!!!

Anyone who believes that a 747(or whatever) could bring the twin towers down, is not stupid. It's possible, period.

But anyone who believes that the same kind of plane would only make a 3m wide whole on the Pentagon, is a complete dumbass. Period.

Nice how you, conveniently, forgot about the part where the fallen astronaut suddenly lifts from the ground while the other was barely touching him.

The fact that you're right about the antennas totally proves everything else false!

@skoockum

Please develop further on what you say that 'And altho, while at times real data are invoked, it's only ever done under conspicuous fallacy'. Examples?