Successfully removed.
Sorry, an error occurred.
|
mygoodname liked a video
(2 hours ago)
A little montage I put together to the tune of Jars of Clay - Flood.
God ...
more
A little montage I put together to the tune of Jars of Clay - Flood.
God has blessed me and I wanted to share the faith and make a video of one of my favorite Christian songs.
God Bless!
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT NOT INTENDED.
Music in this video is property of it's respective artists and labels.
less
|
|
| |
|
|
http://reasonable... - Biola University, 2010 - Perhaps the worst object...
more
http://reasonable... - Biola University, 2010 - Perhaps the worst objections to the Kalam Cosmological Argument you'll ever hear is on youtube (by youtube atheists) and the Internet. Here, Dr. William Lane Craig has fun dealing with these pseudo-intellects and their shallow understanding of the Kalam Cosmological Argument, logic and philosophy. In this episode, atheist claim that literally nothing can do something, like create the universe!
less
|
|
| |
|
|
mygoodname liked a video
(5 hours ago)
|
|
| |
|
|
mygoodname liked a video
(5 hours ago)
Refuting venter creating synthetic life? http://creation.c...
also:
Is RNA...
more
Refuting venter creating synthetic life? http://creation.c...
also:
Is RNA self-replication evidence for evolution?; and: Does CMI tell "flat out" lies?
http://creation.c...
MY COMMENT DEBATE: Pamuk7 vs. AtheistWorldview
AtheistWorldview said:
What I've shown you is that there is a difference between making life out of non life? originally, and taking something living, destroying it and trying to use the dead tissue to create life. In other words, the example given in this video is flawed and irrelevant, and your argument has failed.
(So basically this video he suggests can not be used as proof because we are using dead ingredients so?)
here is the Response:
Pamuk7:
Point 1: The reason why you gave the silly cake analogy was to prove that when elements are broken down they can not be re-used after its process which is clearly wrong that's why we have some thing called a Re-cycling process. And even if you try and combine the dismantled ingredients even if they have lost there functions you have admitted that bringing these functions back to life is impossible thank you for agreeing that non-living elements can not come back alive on there own.
Point 2: Wrong the argument has not failed and I will repeat this 100 times if I have to, since evolution does not base its argument ONLY that LIFE alone comes from LIFE, but rather Life in the begging did come from NON-LIFE.( I.e. non-living elements! Hence even if you dismantled the cell and took out the proteins, amino acids etc etc..and laid them bare it could not re-assemble it self! So how can you claim this did happen many millions of years ago? It could not resemble it self even if you added living ingredients to help re-build a functional cell as shown in the video. Further this is the whole point. It is now also interesting to see that your now arguing from a theist point of view that NON-life could not come to LIFE even though the elements that make a cell are in very close proximity! So thank you for proving our point! Yet on the other hand your now contradicting yourself by disagreeing with yourself with your illogical fallacy by accepting that everything else was created from a single non-living element which further proves that you even now see the absurdity in the theory of atheistic evolution that all living things eventually came from one single non-living element in the begging of this universe! So you see our point finally! This further proves that life coming from non-life even if materials are laid bare is impossible! And Even if we have intelligent scientist present to work with those materials, it cant be done! This further also proves that even if you had the raw complete functional materials which are available today and yet again present under the supervision and careful eye of intelligent human scientist they are enable to re-construct or construct a cell from scratch! so either way you are helpless to concede to the fantastic video which embarrasses your position in your mythological theory of evolution..
2nd debate response to a atheists
mucura1 the atheist parroted yet again:
''Someone please enlighten me. Maybe i took the vid out of context. The way i interpreted the video was like this "I create the perfect enviroment for a cell to live and replicate then proceed to kill the cell by poking it with a syringe and somehow that clearly proves abiogenesis wrong?" Lol. I take a person then poke it with a sterile spear. Its fluid and? intestines will come out. All the fluids it needs to survive but it doesnt replicate it dies, therefore abiogenesis is wrong.
Response to mucous the agnostic atheists
it very well does disprove atheistic evolution why? For the simple fact that regardless if those elements are dead or alive, they still exists in close proximity and since living elements spring out from non-living organisms in the very begging then the same task should be plausible if one was to dismantle a living cell give it time we should see the very same process of coming? back alive all on its own since all the elements are available and in close proximity.
your in denial": it very well disproves since evolution is meant to be based on proof: yet we are still waiting for the proof that: all these elements? can come on there own by producing a first living genome. Its never happened.. and we understand the frustration.
simple task: take out all the elements from the human body that makes and produces? a cell. Make your own little test tube and set your own right conditions and then let all these elements on there own come together and become a functional genome. If you can do this then i will believe it happend own its own without a divine master mind. Until you do so atheistic evolution remains a imagination.
less
|
|
| |
|
|
mygoodname liked a video
(11 hours ago)
Marriage today is struggling. Divorces, adultery, misconceptions, etc ar...
more
Marriage today is struggling. Divorces, adultery, misconceptions, etc are plaguing not only the marriage itself but products of those marriages (my generation and the next). My hope in this poem is to highlight the most frequent and problematic issues marriages face today while also pointing to Jesus as the ultimate healer, redeemer, and restorer of every marriage. Whether single or married, my intention would be that this poem would allow you to look more deeply to Jesus to either better your current marriage, or prepare for your future marriage.
poem inspiration: http://realmarria...
book that inspired the poem: http://amzn.to/zd...
MY INFO:
Facebook: http://www.facebo...
Twitter: http://twitter.co...
website: http://www.jeffbe...
VIDEOGRAPHER INFO:
email: matthew@robgroup.com
website: http://www.cikpro...
twitter: https://twitter.c...
Facebook: http://www.facebo...
OTHER RESOURCES:
website: http://chiselseas...
lyrics: http://www.box.co...
music: http://soundcloud...
To contact regarding booking, speaking, etc email with "speaking request" in subject line for easier organization : jeffersonbethke@gmail.com
shirts to support the ministry (huge piece goes towards helping homeless and downtrodden also. "click 3Sixty House") - http://www.gratef...
Also, ps, we know we misspelled "repentance" at the very end, and could have re-uploaded but didn't want to discount all the shares/comments people have already contributed. So thanks for that, and thanks for the grace on the mistake :)
less
|
|
thanks