Question for Arab Christians: Why do you take on Western names?

Matthew 23 must refer to the Muslim Ummah, not the "Gentile Kingdom accepting Christ",

The words "bring the fruits thereof" alludes to the 1001 inventions of Muslims (muslimheritage.com, 1001inventions.com). Hence, Matt 21:43 cannot refer to the "Gentile kingdom accepting Christ" because the Gentile Christians didn't bring the FRUITS mentioned in 21:43. They brought 1,500 years of Darkness called the 'Dark Ages' and genocides of millions of people who refused Christianity. On the contrary, the Quran says "There is no compulsion in religion", the Muslims didn't force anyone to embrace Islam or follow the tenants. The Quran says "Invite all to way of thy Lord with beautiful preaching and wisdom" (16:125) that is real FRUITS. Therefore, Matt 21:43 is a prophecy about Islam, the Kingdom of GOD was taken away from the Jews after they broke the Covenant and killed the Prophets (Q. 5:13-14) so ceased to be God's chosen people. According to Jere 7:6, the status of Israel being God's chosen people was based on obedience. IT was contingent upon:

"'Hear the word of the LORD, all you people of Judah who come through these gates to worship the LORD. 3 This is what the LORD Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Reform your ways and your actions, and I will let you live in this place. 4 Do not trust in deceptive words and say, "This is the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD!" 5 If you really change your ways and your actions and deal with each other justly, 6 if you do not oppress the foreigner, the fatherless or the widow and do not shed innocent blood in this place, and if you do not follow other gods to your own harm, 7 then I will let you live in this place, in the land I gave your ancestors for ever and ever. (Jeremiah 7:1-6).

Israel is NO LONGER the chosen people because they SHED the blood of foreigners (the Palestinians, to this day) and worshipped idols of Baal. The Quran confirms Jere 7:1-6 in many verses, it confirms Isa. 5:24 and Amos 2:4 in the Noble Verse 5:13-14. The Jews BROKE the Covenant and DID NOT follow the Commandments (Ecc 12:13), they failed to FULFILL their PART of the Covenant so GOD would fulfill HIS PART. However, the Jews rebelled and "rejected the law of the Lord" (Isa. 5:24). GOD calls them "stiff necked" and "rebellious" in the Torah and ACCURSED in the Quran (Surah Fatiha). SO today the Christians who don't support Israel claim to be God's new chosen people (the New Israel) but evidently Matt 21:43 doesn't refer to them. They brought upon themselves the DARK AGES and waged war against the Truth (Islam). Jesus never claimed to be the last prophet, he said "By their fruits ye shall know them". The fruits of Islam are indisputable, the SON of Abraham through is LEGAL WIFE Hagar (Gen 16:1, 17:23 ) was blessed in the Covenant. He was circumcised BEFORE Isaac, he was blessed BEFORE Isaac, he was Abraham's ONLY SON for 13 years before Isaac was born. Therefore, the "only son" of Abraham offered as a Sacrifice was Ishmael, not Isaac (Gen. 22:2, 12, 16). The name Ishmael means GOD HEARD which is profound and significant, the Israelite scribes who wrote the Bible were BIASED and wanted GOD partial to them alone. They invented LIES against Ishmael calling him "wild donkey of a man", they also invented LIES about GOD.

The Evangelical warmongering scumbags who support Israel claim GOD established a "dual covenant". Yet, the concept of a "dual covenant" Is UNBIBLICAL. These pro-Israel Christians don't realize that Jews are doomed according to Luke 19:27 if they reject Jesus. They ALL reject Jesus to this day, how could GOD allow them to enter Paradise (in the world to come?) after rejecting the Messiah? The "remnant of Israel" in the Book of Revelation doesn't mean ALL the Jews (Israel), the vast majority will be KILLED by Jesus' orders (Luke 19:27). Those who didn't accept Jesus as King would be killed, so Luke 19:27 exclusively refers to the Jews. IT's not inclusive to the Muslims who believe in the True Jesus and believe He shall descend as a KING on his 2nd coming, He shall destroy the cross and kills pigs. Heretics like John Hagee will be overthrown and destroyed, the concept of a "dual covenant" is UNBIBLICAL as explained here:

The real terrorist is america and israel, they have killed millions of people. The suicide bombers are condemned in Islam, they never killed that many. The real terrorists are those who KILLED THEIR OWN PEOPLE on 9/11. 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB by Mossad and the US government as "pretext" to invade the world (the Middle East). They are liars and deceivers, the reason why Jews and Christians are UNITED today is because BOTH of their "religions" have been Europanized. The Arab Christians are Europeanized fools, they claim to love the Arabic language but TAKE ON WESTERN NAMES. South Asian Christians take on European names like "Jerry" instead of ethnic cultural names.

The scholar John P. Meir reconstructs the TF (Testimonium Flavianum) as follows:

At this time there appeared Jesus, a wise man. For he was a doer of startling deeds, a teacher of people who receive the truth with pleasure. And he gained a following among many Jews and among many of Gentile origin. And when Pilate, because of an accusation made by the leading men among us, condemned him to the cross, those who had loved him previously did not cease to do so. And up until this very day the tribe of Christians (named after him) had not died out.

(John P. Meier in A Marginal Jew, pp 61)

There's no mention of Jesus' resurrection! So the Historian Josephus NEVER mentions Jesus' resurrection! That means the "resurrection" is NOT confirmed by ANY non-Christian Source in the First Century CE!

The fact that Josephus affirms the "crucifixion" doesn't prove anything because it doesn't contradict the Quran. The Quran doesn't deny that A crucifixion took place (4:157), it simply denies that Jesus was killed or crucified. But a crucifixion took place, which gels with Josephus, but Muslims believe Jesus swooned or was substituted with another. The swoon-theory Muslims believe Jesus was put on the cross but DID NOT DIE, others (the Substitution-theory Muslims) believe Jesus was saved from the cross and SOMEONE else died in his place. The latter view is supported by the Classical Salafi scholars of Islam like Ibn Abbas and Ibn Kathir. And the Prophet said to follow the Salafi, so Muslims must uphold the Substitution theory, although the Quran itself DOES NOT explicitly say "he was replaced". The words "they didn't kill nor crucify him" could mean "they didn't stone him to death" nor PUT him on a cross (crucify, crucifixion). Others disagree with newly found Evidence that Jesus put on cross and swooned. There was no resurrection but a Human revival of Jesus' body without Divine intervention. Now whether Jesus swooned and later resuscitated or saved by GOD before the cross, Josephus a Historian DID NOT mention the resurrection! That news didn't reach him because it never happened! Either that's a PAGAN influence from the Mystery cults (dying rising gods) or a resuscitation by his followers. The fact is Jesus' resurrection in the gospels (except Matt 28) is NOT supernatural. Only Matthew 28 describes a supernatural resurrection, but NOBODY affirms it, not Christians, Jews, or historians. There's nothing about an 'angel descending from Heaven' and moving the stone in Josephus. Historians usually reject supernatural elements and accept what is Natural. And the Gospels describe a very NATURAL event, a non-resurrection. A human revival, who moved the stone to take Jesus' body and revive it? IT was a human being and GOD had nothing to do with it! So where's the miracle? IF only all FOUR Gospels said what Matthew says! There is nothing but contradictions in the Gospels!