Hi Evmac00,

Although you probably won't read this reply, I just wanted to point out that it is in fact, NOT a medical fact that the cells inside a woman in the first trimester are a baby. That's why there are different medical terms for each stage of development. A zygote is not a baby. An embryo is not a baby. A fetus is not even a baby. In fact, 'baby' is a term reserved for human offspring after birth. You can say I'm arguing semantics, but these terms exist because medical science finds a distinct difference between a baby and any of these other phases in utero.

In other words, the research has been done, medicine has spoken, society has spoken, the law has spoken: abortion is acceptable and legal. But, as always, there are groups who wish to impose their opinion on others, even in light of the current societal standpoint. The fact is, these groups are never successful in changing years of progress and in changing minds that have already moved on from the debate.

I love how you respond with the comment "...most pro-lifers are misinformed" like you're schooling me. You have no clue what you're talking about. That's ok though... b/c most pro-choicers are even more misinformed.
Regardless, if up to 14 weeks is still the first trimester, what exactly is YOUR point? I still maintain that most abortions are after the point you're saying the baby is "alive". And I still maintain that a baby is alive from the moment it is conceived. -simply at a younger point in developement. I also don't understand why this is even an argument anyway.. the real argument is.. is it right or wrong to kill the baby in your womb? There is no discussion as to whether it IS a baby. That is a medical fact. And it's proven even by pro-choice doctors and scientists... this argument about whether it's human or some other form at that stage of development is just a way to evade the real problem with abortion. Enough said.

Look at the comments on the DwayneHollowayTV page. He can't understand why someone called him a future serial killer and then he babbles on how people like the commenter are why the inquisition happened. What an idiot, huh?

@Nixmix24

Is it beyond you to realize that not all pro-choice supporters have had an abortion (me, for instance)? So, no I don't buy your theory that individuals are pro-choice because of guilt.

mixxycan: How you make the leap in assumption that a woman who feels terrible guilt about her abortion would then want to encourage women to choose it is beyond me.

Is it beyond you to realize how true the statement, "misery loves company" is? How often have you seen someone try to justify doing someting they know is wrong? It happens all the time. It doesn't take a leap in assumption to see that the pro abortion movement is one that is fueled by people who want to feel better about their decision to kill their unborn child.

@princess1443
No kidding most women who have abortion are pro-choice. Did you expect to find a high number of anti-choicers who had had abortions?

The reason I don't have aborted fetuses on my channel is that 1) I don't see the point and 2) I think it would be a bit gross. You're confusing my support of choice with what you think is a love and adoration of abortion. Being in support of a woman's right to choose does not mean that we wish to glorify abortion and publish photos and videos of it. Making sense yet?

How you make the leap in assumption that a woman who feels terrible guilt about her abortion would then want to encourage women to choose it is beyond me. To me, it would seem that if a large number of women who have had abortions are pro-choice, that must mean they DO NOT regret their choice to abort. But I'm logical like that.

Hmm, princess, so even though you began that comment by typing "Hey mixxycan," it wasn't directed at me? That's a bit curious!

Perhaps you're talking about your original claim that all women who have abortions wind up becoming clinically depressed. I did reply to that (citing research that proves your claim is false, which rosaryfilms must have found too intelligent, as it has since been deleted), as YouTube is a open forum in which anyone can read and reply to your comments. So, I don't really think I needed your permission.

Just a note: rosaryfilms, those wonderful purveyors of anti-choice propaganda, have blocked me from commenting on their videos and have deleted one of my comments on the "Abortion & Pro-Choice Lies Hurts Women - Pro-Life Video PSA" video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=846obU0lXbg&feature=related where princess1443 has also posted a slanderous comment about me, accusing me of replying to her personal email. I'm assuming she is either just lying for the fun of it or does not know the difference between a personal email and a YouTube email notification. Both would seem characteristic of an anti-choicer, no?