Hey:) Nice name haha:P

Still a Twat!

nun u?

Well that's wonderful. Giving me an upside down ^^. Because I *really* know what that means. Not. Considering the previous comments from you though, I would say it was safe to assume it is not exactly friendly. So I suppose I should be nasty. But you haven't really given me much to work with. For a start I don't know what an upside down ^^ is. But yes, anyway, moving on to the insults (which unfortunately cannot be entwined into a very in depth response to why your comment is wrong, due to the unknown meaning of ^^). So. Assuming you're still homophobic, you are still a narrow minded, bullshitting twat who is generally not very nice. Nor a peace maker. Very un-peace-maker-like are you. And vulgar. But being vulgar isn't so bad; I'm being vulgar and I am generally a nice person. I think. I would say being vulgar doesn't make you nasty, but being vulgar in a homophobic (and therefore prickish etc) fashion DOES. Which makes you NASTY.

Talking is good though!! Without talking, chances are there wouldn't BE any society, so I can't be a DISEASE to it. And besides, even if I was (which I'm not - obviously), I have nothing else to do. Well, actually, I have lots to do really. Just nothing fun. Revising for exams being the most prominent 'nothing fun', due to it being science (though I can't remember WHICH science), but like I said SCIENCE. Meaning I can't be fucked. Because, regardless of the amount of revision I do, I will fail. Or at least not get whatever mark I am SUPPOSED to be getting. And YouTube is much more entertaining; the amount of people with bullshit ideas and views etc., means there are lots (and lots) of opportunities to have an argument. But I only ever choose to argue with pricks. Such as you.

Three questions actually. But the lack of punctuation thing was kind of rhetorical. Kind of. So I will settle on two and a half. And as it turns out, with this comment as well, I have typed more than I did in the comment-wot-wuz-lost. But it has been fun my dear friend. Dear friend because I would like a friend like you; it is MUCH more fun to argue than agree. Mainly because arguing can end in agreeing (meaning you get both), but agreeing can never end in arguing (meaning you only get ONE. Which is a boring as fuck).

How am I a disease??? I will ask you this, and only this, as I cannot be bothered to type out my very long and detailed (and for whatever reason, LOST) comment about you grammar (or rather lack of it) and possible reasons why I am a disease. The most likely of which I found to be that, due to my defending of gay people, you have automatically (and incorrectly) made the assumption that I am gay myself. And because of your small-minded, bullshitting brain, view that to be a disease. But like I said in the comment-wot-wuz-LOST, I do not know. So I would appreciate you explaining why I am a disease. And also how exactly insulting gay people equals peace, as it seems to not appear in your "dont post on my page you disease". AND SEE THE LACK OF PUNCTUATION?!?!?!? Tut tut. And, okay, that was TWO questions. Which means I lied. But whatever. You brought it on yourself! Not that you will answer either one of them. Because you are a TWAT, lol.

Like FUCK it does! "putting gays down = peace", as you say, is in no way correct, let alone PEACEFUL. Because, in the words of the holy saint Wikipedia, "Peace is commonly understood as the absence of hostility". And (not in the words of the holy saint Wikipedia) it is very much the OPPOSITE of you statement. So would you care to explain exactly HOW insulting - at this point in reading your comment I presumed you meant insulting, as I find it hard to believe that even someone as small minded and vulgar as you would think killing homosexuals equals peace) gay people creates anything REMOTELY harmonious?

"Fuck bieber fuck gays" isn't a very good way to get your point across now is it? Mainly due to that fact that, assuming (and I say assuming) you dislike both "bieber" and "gays", you would not like to fuck either one of them (unless y'know, that's your... umm,... *thing*). So stating that you do is rather backward don't you think? Or maybe you don't. I mean you don't use punctuation, you use very primitive forms of insults and you consider yourself a "peace maker" do you not?... No, I cannot see any thinking. To consider oneself a peace maker I would say that you would have to, at least, be a calm, rational, NICE human being, which, from what I can tell, you are not.

TwAt!