read about type 92 shagekiban,94 hoiban and sokutekiban these were what made the ijn fcs.one page said U.S radar's advantage over the ijn was that it was more flexible and required less manning.reading about sokutekiban apparently has no western equivalent also according to Sol3a1 iowas radar picks up yamato at 23miles(38km).type 22 mod radar on yamato was 22miles mark7 16inch was 24miles or 38km musashi was 26miles or 42km

Also about FCS - well I think that Iowa's was better. Do you have proofs for Yamato's FCS?
Mk-13 radar could spot to 45km, while Type-22 radar could spot to 40km. But, of course, that wouldn't help Iowa even a little. Her guns had range of 35km, while Yamato's had range of 40km.
Yamato could also use a E13A Jake seaplane to spot the target, and fire to given coordinates.

Iowa's armor was inferior to Yamato's, only because it was thinner or every spot. That's simple logistics. However, there are still many ignorant Americans who still think that Iowa was the best, only because it was their ship, and they're desperately trying to draw out some nonsense and idiotic excuses, like that one saying that Iowa had some kind of ''STS armor''.
Well if she had that, then why did the US tanks didn't have that, and a German Tiger could destroy them at 2,000m?

doing research on the iowa i found out that there's a design defect relating to the iowa classes armour.and also idk why people think iowa would win over yamato when there was a review of the ijn's(yamato and musashi) fcs system when it concluded that the ijn fcs was updated than the mk 38 fcs armed on the iowa class.

Nice picture, dude, if I can notice.
What do I think about sol3a1? Well, he's the first person I ever met on the web. I started a debate about Yamato and Iowa with him jet from July 2011 on a Top 10 Battleships video, but silly, that debate is going on to the present day. Many people joined since then including you now.
The biggest mistake is that he thinks that if a ship has a better radar, that ship wins. Iowa's radar was maybe better than Yamato's but that doesn't helps at all, when looking on main and the most important performances, such as armor, guns, shells and range, where Yamato wins.

i'm just wondering what do u think of Sol3a1?.i think he reads alot but ends up misreading about things.like for instance he read about the type 22 mod radar but got confused BB range to CA range.idk if u know this but people who think iowa was more maneuverable are actually wrong because the turning circle of the iowa was 800m whereas the yamato was 640m

i can't remeber but it was somethimg to do with being a retard or something like that

I sent thousands of comments to him, of which one are you talking about?

that comment u said to Sol3a1 that's now not shown.

What comment, dude? Are you healthy?