How much experience do you have in any related field of science exactly?

All of these theories from persons who tried to disprove anthropogenic climate change have been based on cherry picked or outdated data, or simply miss a significant part of the complete picture.
The idea of debate on whether it's real or not itself is outdated, there is already consensus on the issue of climate change, Any given issue being studied by science has the following life cycle:

Conception (by observation or theory) > Debate based on incoming evidence > Consensus based on rapidly converging evidence towards a particular conclusion.

Those so called scientists have showed up late with antiquated data and ideas to a field of science that evolves so rapidly that data more than four years old is no longer considered current. In other words they showed up at the debate when everybody has already packed up and gone back to work.

Nice channel =-}

Global cooling is total fantasy. Its fans can't provide a single real science reference to back themselves up. Meanwhile...here is a paper with the overwhelming evidence that European wild plants are reacting to INCREASES in temperatures caused by climate change.
Sparks et. al., European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern.Global Change Biology. Volume 12 Issue 10, Pages 1969 - 1976.
This is what science looks like- read it an weep climate change deniers.

Great documentary on Global Warming. Thanks for posting it.

Another religious person who can't stand to have comments on their channel.

Thanks my friend. Your page is awesome.

LilBola1,

The issue here is not whether the climate is changing or not, but rather what is causing it. Giving humanity the guilt trip does not help the debate in any way. Furthermore, I find your comment about Nazi imperialism is irrelevant in a scientific debate. Science or bust! ;-)

When the ice-caps are gone, and the amazon has been ignited, there will be a day of reckoning. People will look back on those who were skeptical or indifferent to climate change the same way we look back on those who enabled Nazi imperialism in the 1930s.

UN is nothing bollocks they just talk did they stoped the massacre in africa? the massacre of innocent in cyprus? the killing in myamar? no
un is just a tool that cant do anything

25 years ago, the liberal education system tried indoctrinating me into the GW philosophies but failed as, even then, the data seemed as only speculation itself. As I became older and GW became more popular and trendy, I took more Natural Science classes at higher levels of education only to find that most 'facts' that the climate change was based on had never been proven. I have compiled much data over the years and still there are unanswered questions. I have become an infidel or a non-believer to the GW religion which plagues the world. There is not a doubt in my mind that the Earth is heating up but this occurrance is natural and creates no reason for alarm. CO2 cannot be tied to it, the critics are and have been wrong. BTW, if anyone sees Al, please tell him to shovel my driveway!