noted and filed.........

I rarely get on YT, so I don't know what we were arguing about, nor do I care. But I just wanted to respond because you told me to get a job and told me that I don't attend a University. However, i am currently typing this response from my University, the University of Maryland. Also, I do currently have a job. So...yeah..

And dean

Just how is prohibition effective again?

Why do you lend your support to a policy you know doesnt do what it claims to?

Good try dean

You cant calim to want weed ILLEGAL and not support prohib!
If you want something ILLEGAL you PROHIBIT IT!

Youre not too bright dean.

I've said my part. From what I know first hand I think that it shouldn't be legal. The laws here sound a lot less strict than in America so I can see you're annoyance. Some of my mates smoke weed all the time, it feels practically legal to be honest. That's why I'm not classing it with stronger drugs.


And it's not my beloved policy. You assume that I am strongly and passionately in favour of prohibition. I just think it's should be illegal. I don't think you understand some of what I've said. As Cannabis isn't as strong as other drugs the people who want it legalised have strong arguments but nowadays the stuff is a lot stronger than what it was before. Anyway, carry on fighting.

Dean
You ARE classifying Cannabis with coke and meth AS YOU ADVOCATE ITS PROHIBITION along with those drugs. You call it "dangerous" as if it harms people like coke and meth.

Im not "making up" anything dean.

As far as your experience;
If you had any experience with cannabis you would KNOW that its not dangerous to responsible people. Yet, here you are claiming otherwise, telling me we ought to put users in jail because its somehow "dangerous" and "harmful". So harmful that it warrants limiting peoples sentient rights.
Though you FAIL to explain just HOW it is so harmful to warrant such or how it is SO DANGEROUS that we should be filling our prisons with its users.
Im simply pointing out that you are FACTUALLY INCORRECT dean and that youve not PROVEN that prohibition is effective or useful at all.

Why cant you support your beloved, Totalitarianist policy?

HAHAHA you really can't read. Read my last comment again - it's YOU saying these things, I have never said them, you are making stuff up for some reason. I'm not classifying them together, and I do have first hand experience. Am I not allowed a viewpoint even if I have this experience? And all you go on about is freedom and liberty....

And here you are again dean. Calling me stupid when you are the one here erroneously comparing Cannabis to substances like coke, meth, and heroin. Youre not too bright are you?
Anyone who admits, as you have, that they have no knowledge of drugs and still proclaims that Cannabis is somehow "bad" really has their head UP THEIR ASS!

LoL this is why this argument has to stop as you have said that, 1: I'm classifying cannbis with coke, heroin, etc and 2. I have no experience or knowledge first hand.

Maybe you just aren't reading what I've written before, maybe you need to realise it's YOU with your head up your arse.

Oh dean.........
You prohibitionists are so good at putting words in peoples mouths! You folks are the STRAWMAN KINGS!
Never said Canna was completley harmless. I said its not a "harmful drug" in the context of potentiality. There is always potential for harm with any drug, HOWEVER, since cannabis is the least harmful drug known to man(never killed anyone, cant find regular stats for harm occurring with use, actually CURES some disease), your calling it a 'harmful drug" and lumping it in with things like coke, meth, heroin, etc. is just ludicrous.
Nobody who has any experience with drugs at all will tell you that Cannabis belongs in the same class as those drugs dean. ANd you are believeing what you are told dean. Its quite evident. Otherwise you wouldnt be erroneously classifying Cannabis. You wouldnt do that if you had any real experience or knowledge.




You fail.