A True Skeptic. However, forums and internet gave rise to thousands of cynical Psycho Skeptics.You can't argue the facts I presented. Skeptics by nature don't look close enough at evidence supporting the theory. They are supposed to. But in reality, most skeptics don't look for supporting evidence, only evidence to debunk the claim. As well, a skeptic will only choose to critisize a theory based on his belief of it not being real.You don't see unbiased skeptics looking at both sides of the evidence with indifference.You see the exact opposite - a reflex action quickly pointing out the first obvious flaws or good counter claims. This is entirely the wrong way to find any evidence; pro or con. That is why skeptics will always have the weaker hand. Note: Some true, open-minded, unbiased (qualified) skeptics report that after investigating a claim they did not believe, afterwords, they believed in it due to the amount of supporting evidence they uncovered. That is how a real skeptic works. Unfortunately, the theories and belief patterns of real scientists have been shrunk into biased unconventional theories. Accordingly, wannabe scientist skeptics also learn these techniques and add ther own "logic" to the equation and you have a fumbled solution .It just doesn't, won't, and will never work. Skepticism is only counter-productive. This does not mean to blindly believe, or be biased unfairly to the pro side of the theory. Neutral, both sides. So naturally the majority of believers and open- minded people lack this first obstacle of unbiased opinion because a believer doesn't exclusively believe, they are open to being wrong. Where a skeptic on the most part exclusively doesn't believe in it because that is a definition of a skeptic. More often than not, the skeptic gets defensive when his claim is challenged, he refuses to be wrong, and also dislikes being wrong, as well as when his "Job" of being a skeptic means when they prove a theory wrong they won a prize.They won the theoretical debate. They are smarter because they debunked this "hoax". Thus, the skeptic has another disadvantage. There is a winning and reward factor when a skeptic succesfully "debunks" a theory. On the other hand, the believer, experimenter, or True Skeptic does not really care if they prove or disprove the theory. Because to them, proving the theory wrong, is the same reward as proving it right.They just want the truth. Ironically, the same goal the "Skeptic" or Psycho Skeptic tries to achieve. However, they have the above mentioned handicaps which make their arguments not in the least bit solid.

It just stumps me, Truly does. These guys are middle aged, schooled and went to college. Perfect nit picking spellers. They talk thru ther ass, and get ther kicks out of trieng to ALWAYS seem more intelligent then the next forum poster.This is why skeptics are the dumbest people.There are Skeptics, and thers ther are Psycho Skeptics.A true, noble, intelligent, skeptic is open minded. He has no beliefs, and no bias.A psycho skeptic, is the one we see everyone on the net.
This is the person, that already does not believe in the possibility, they may think or even fool themselves into thinking they are open minded, but the fact is they are not.These are the people who will say, its fake, or not real, without any evidence.Only using ther "logic" wich ofcourse is based on ther beliefs, presumptions and biases.They are proud to be skeptics, and alike themselves to scientists. They use ther "logic" to see if a claim is real or not. Considering most skeptics, go against uncommon beliefes or theories, they always have ther logic wich tells them "No, logically, this is impossible"Anti gravity is impossible. It denies the laws of physics.Or they will say, thats not true, for this and that reason.But these "skeptics" already are biased to the theories. Making there statements and anything they say, absolutely void.Another thing is, being a skeptic, is a personality. Its not what you do. Its who you are. From day one, if anything they see, does not conform to what "normal" theories explain. Its instantly BS. And as ther expert jobs as skeptics, they quickly try to debunk those theories.But im sure the true believers, experimentors, also agree, that these "psycho skeptics" appear more and more ilogical. As new discoveries arise daily, and laws of physics are added on to every so often, its not hard to see that indeed the believers are more or less in the winning side.And the skeptics, are in the loosing side. In conclusion, ther will always be skeptics and believers.Yet, the skeptics arent the ones that go on to make new inventions, discoveries, and dig deep into the theoriy and pull out the evidence to prove the claim.Because ther is plenty of evidence that skeptics never see, nor search out, nor study. Because by society, they are the skeptics.On the contrary, the believers, the scientists being mocked by "skeptics",are the ones who invent new discoveries.Look at Diesel, Tesla, etc. The wright brothers did not invent the plane, by thinking about how to go into the ground. As the quote goes.That is why skeptics are the lamest, especially psycho skeptics, and the ones that rant on an on, talking out ther ASS, pretending to debunk an experiment or technology they have never seen.So keep that in mind, next time you read a so called "intelligent" skeptics remarks.