Ah, but that begs the question. The shareholders should make that decision. The shareholders should make the assessment of whether or not there is conflict – not R. Edward Freeman. Finally, presuming that Milton Friedman would be for this (i.e. stakeholder view) is a terrible mistake.
@Zaunstar Sorry – been away. I agree totally. Akaei0 seems to think evolution explains not only our morality – but the *objectivity* of it. Evolution claims to do no such thing. Thanks for the response.
@doubtingED Hey Zaunstar, is this a friend of yours? : ) DoubtingED, thanks for highlighting the fact that human beings learn things. The default position until we begin to learn things is to sit in our own feces.
@Wulfshade I’m talking *mainstream* NT scholarship. Of course, one could say their worldviews could color their opinion, but it’s in the *mainstream* nonetheless. One could tell the Jews that they have a vested interest in presenting certain information about the holocaust in a certain way – t...
Ah, but that begs the question. The shareholders should make that decision. The shareholders should make the assessment of whether or not there is conflict – not R. Edward Freeman. Finally, presuming that Milton Friedman would be for this (i.e. stakeholder view) is a terrible mistake.