China doesn't purge the internet of files, they block access to content. Those are two completely different things.
As if the millions taxed each year to an employee base like google's isn't enough, they need to find ways to skim off more profits from the top.
Yet they tell us they want to create jobs and reduce unemployment... ha... what a joke.
1:10 "well that brings me to tonight's number, five, as in the number five."
Tonight's number, five, IS THE NUMBER FIVE?!?!?! OMG I totally thought she meant the person five, after she started off saying tonights number...!!!!
What the fk am I watching sesame street? jesus h christ
"thank god it was a knife because that's a way fairer battle than a gun."
It doesn't even sound like he put up a battle when the fight came to him.
The fact that he used a blade allowed him to sneak up on people and slash them in the face and the back of the head, If he were to use a gun, the entire school would have been in lockdown or evacuated within minutes due to the loud and distinct sound of gunfire.
Nobody should be thankful he had a knife, as it says on the cnn power point hes reading
Good arguments to what? your dumb comment?
Who's to say that the reason he DIDN'T have a firearm was because our system of background checks for purchases of firearms worked and he was unable to legally obtain one anywhere?
You still going to try to use a knife attack as a reason for promoting your misled opinion of increasing gun regulation?
All this talk about this machine replacing the human worker... Its a computer, it only does what it's told, its completely limited by the commands it is or isn't given by its controller.
Furthermore, 3d modelling an object from scratch rather than just scanning one can become extremely complicated and skill oriented very quickly as objects become more complex.
This won't replace the human worker, but it will drive the obsolete human worker who refuses to adapt to new technology out of business.
lol how humiliating... you make him pick his 5$ prize on camera :P
Question: at around 5:15 when the corsairs attack their 2nd rank only contributes 1 attack per model, even though they wield 2 weapons and have 2 attacks each?
Is this the rule for any model attacking from a 2nd 3rd or 4th rank? that they can only contribute 1 attack per model, regardless of number of attacks the model has?
He's already scared. Listen to his voice crack when he says that shit.
I give it two years until he has a swatzticka on his forehead.
Wow Anothony Howard,
It's called a cover. People do this a lot in music, even the legends do it. Even Eddie Hazel who created maggot brain! He covered songs created by other people.
(Eddie Hazel "California Dreamin") (epic cover song)
Free your mind and your ass will follow.
You look to your right like ever 5 seconds... It makes you look like one of those clocks that looks like a cat, with the eyes that go from left to right as the tail swings like a pendulum. youtube.com/watch?v=X_fvoR51xTM
If I wrote a song and led zeppelin stole it, I would be flattered.
It would be proof that I was good at writing songs/instrumentals.
(which I'm not.)
2:37 Cheap way to roll dice.
3:06 You're so serous when you say this and there is a hint of sincere concern for your veiwers. It made me laugh XD
Never seen this channel but after suggesting something as awesome as eddie hazel to others, you earned yourself a subscribe!
you could build a tube & plunger attached to the string and shoot a paintball. Seen it done with bows. Youd just want it under a certain fps or its gonna leave big welts X)
that's two fingers!!
How in god's name did they unload on the wrong truck? I thought they were bound by law to go for an arrest unless in a life or death situation in which they need to defend themselves? I guess when you target a cops daughter the cops throw the rules out the window and just start shooting blind before they even see the suspect, let alone a weapon.
All I've seen is protest from Russian citizens, by the thousands, regarding the draconic new laws on adopting orphans, politically motivated, but in the end the laws just hurt orphans by denying them the affection, attention, and resources of approved foster parents. (parents which, before the adoption ban, we're reviewed extensively and only then accepted as candidates as foster parents.)
Feel free to point out an instance of social services attacking "parents like these" and trying to kidnap