jredbar's channel

where's the rest you tease?

@huevosteve more subtle

@writersblock26 to play devils advocate. if being gay were a choice I could see the prerogative of someone choosing to criticize or disrespect that choice (though I personally wouldn't care to do so). the fact that being gay is not a choice solidifies that one MUST respect gays or lesbians as one...

a good evening had by all.

@Svoig agree completely that Osama had the right to a just trial (as well I could see a dilemma buried in your previous statement as an eternal question to the affect, can killing rectify an atrocity?) .the issue of taking life should only ever be held to the circumstances surrounding each disti...

'god is not great, how RELIGION poisons everything' not, 'god, without a reasonable doubt does not exist'

Hitchens gives a direct cohesive answer to each of sharptons questions/propositions and is rebutted by a reformulation of said questions/propositions. either it's ignorance or evasion on shar...

@timewilltell7 the extinction of religion would not necessarily bring cheer and happiness on high. depression and misery are obstacles requiring reconciliation of themselves and possibly are catalytic causes resulting in religion, which then perpetuates misery since religion is a feeble response...

@XavierMarkus1 how does intending to hit a target discredit that target? and if you are shooting with the wind would that not assist your shot? aligning ones self with extremists implies nothing of that persons character?

@attemptingtobehumble perhaps your endeavor toward humility should be reassessed?

@megabigblur liking people is beside the point. the revelation of this experiment resides in the discovery that animals other than human hold the capacity for laughter. a trait largely regarded exclusively human.

did you know rats laugh when you tickle them?

Agree with Hitchens in principle. He isn't tackling the question on morality that Turek postulates. An evolutionary and humanist explanation for morality does exist. I don't agree with Turek but he does pose his question in a unique way that Hitchens isn’t adequately addressing.

I must admit Hitchens delivers a much more acute synopsis in the Q & A portion of the test. (sorry to all for rambling on with comments)

@fidilino no they didn't

good thing Hitchens can't see. It'd be hard to argue and keep your thoughts organized staring at such an absurd cretin.

@al5mnd9trnksdr745bi what are you talking about?

@timm9 sounds vehemently supportive of suggested karma. Which seems as something deserving of karmic retaliation in and of itself. You use the balancing act of karma to place regarded opinions on some perceived higher echelon. No person is above the judgment of recognized acts. No learning or ins...