-
jndillaha liked 14 hours ago
Ouverture Solennelle 1812, Op.49 (B)
Music composed by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky. Riccardo Muti;The Philadelphia Orchestra.
(Tchaikovsky did not write: God Preserve Thy People, La Mars...
-
jndillaha liked 5 days ago
Beethoven - Violin Concerto in D, Op.61 (Color-Coded Analysis)
Ludwig van Beethoven's Violin Concerto in D major, Op. 61 (1806)
I.Allegro ma non troppo (D major) @0:00
II.Larghetto (G major) @23:06
III.Rondo. A...
-
jndillaha commented 1 week ago
Priest can't answer how all humans came from Cain and Abel
https://www.DoctorOfDisbeli... Priest cannot answer how Adam and Eve's children, Cain and Able (both male), had chi...
@JimothyMcgee
and this is precisely the reason that God told us, through the Bible, that incest is wrong, because it is bad genetically for the children of such unions. but, as you fail to understand, the question was posed to me whether incest would be wrong if DNA were altered so that incestual...
-
jndillaha commented 1 week ago
Priest can't answer how all humans came from Cain and Abel
https://www.DoctorOfDisbeli... Priest cannot answer how Adam and Eve's children, Cain and Able (both male), had chi...
@sexyloser
if we altered the DNA and lost the stigma of incest, then based on the reason God made incest wrong, yes it would be ok. what about, would you feel incest is wrong? and why do you feel it is wrong in the first place? you must be a believer in the Bible, otherwise you would have no reas...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Priest can't answer how all humans came from Cain and Abel
https://www.DoctorOfDisbeli... Priest cannot answer how Adam and Eve's children, Cain and Able (both male), had chi...
this is obvious. they had children with their sisters. there is nothing wrong with this since the reason that incest is wrong today is because of the genetic issues that are caused by siblings procreating with eachother, problems that scientifically couldn not be present in a pure bloodline, such...
-
-
jndillaha liked 1 week ago
Michigan's Chilson Creek Mink - Hamburg, Michigan
Two mink in Chilson Creek, S.E. Michigan, Hamburg Twp. Jan 2008
-
jndillaha commented 1 week ago
NBA Live intro's
Live 96,97,98,99 and 2000 introductions. The intro for 97 skips a little sorry.
i didnt play bass the last time i heard the intro to nba live 2000, which was probably about ten years ago. i never appreciated the bass section of that intro music. nice.
-
@seidenman65
yeah, the virtuosity is what i was most impressed with. its incredible how well it is played by angel romero. he accents some notes that give it a different feel but i sometimes wonder if he is accenting them because they are a hard transition to make and it is the only way to mainta...
-
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@ishaan212
firstly, i think that the way that layers of strata are layed down is evidence of a global flood, since, contrary to what the textbooks say and what the overal concensus is, these layers are not laid down in a regular pattern suggesting ordered layers representing the surfaces of the e...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@ishaan212
ok, im not going to try to prove that the earth is NOT billions of years old, because that is fairly straight forward and much scientific evidence shows this. but i think you are asking a somewhat tougher, yet in some respects easier, question, "what evidence is there that the earth is...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
they dated the soft tissue. the scientists who wrote the biofilm papers thought that what was dated was biofilm, but they were later proven wrong. so it turns out that what they dated was soft tissue. they are correct that it contained C14, but they are incorrect when they say it is...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
according to "Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms," " Carbon dating of the film points to its relatively modern origin" and according to "T-Rex 'Tissue' May Be the Real Deal After All" and "Reexamination Of T. Rex Verifies Disputed Biochemical Remains," the fi...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
is the age of the earth supposed to be the same as the age of the universe? what are you talking about? young earth creationists didnt hijacak her research, it was other scientists who wanted to prove that it was soft tissue because they knew that soft tissue couldnt last that long....
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@ishaan212
so it does need to be old for human evolution? since humans exist, i will take that as yes, yes and yes?
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
its been a couple of years now. in fact, i was talking about this when it was still believed that biofilm was what was found, before it was reexamined and proved to be soft tissue. its funny that your friend probably still cant explain why soft tissue and carbon14 have been found in...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@ishaan212
ok, but before we get into this i want to ask some questions. first, do you believe in evolution? i assume you do based on our previous discussion. secondly, do you admit that in order for evolution to be real, the earth must also be quite old, somewhere on the scale of what general sc...
-
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Bible Prophecies? No... - The Atheist Experience 726
****READ****
George from Delaware calls in (AKA:Thomas/Mark/Mike/Andrew/B
ob). Here are the episodes when he has called before:
Thomas:http://www....
@alltiedup217
i understand that this is what the biofilm people contend, but as i said earlier, later studies by Marshall Bern, Brett S. Phinney and David Goldberg show that they found traces of protein peptides from collagen and that it is no longer disputed that soft tissue was found. you may a...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Bible Prophecies? No... - The Atheist Experience 726
****READ****
George from Delaware calls in (AKA:Thomas/Mark/Mike/Andrew/B
ob). Here are the episodes when he has called before:
Thomas:http://www....
@alltiedup217
do you take issue with what i said, or are you more interested in following me around and calling me a liar? why dont you explain what it is you take issue with? or maybe you would like to use this video to explain why soft tissue and C14 are found in dinosaur bones, since you haven...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Bible Prophecies? No... - The Atheist Experience 726
****READ****
George from Delaware calls in (AKA:Thomas/Mark/Mike/Andrew/B
ob). Here are the episodes when he has called before:
Thomas:http://www....
this might be a good atheist argument if there werent literally hundreds of historically confirmed prophecies in the Bible, and if multiple prophecies werent confirmed by the same singular event. but since they are, it requires a closer look.
-
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@Allabaster84
apparently you arent very well studied in this regard because if you were, you would know that there is much documentation proving the existence of dinosuars in the last few thousand years. marco polo, pliny the young, the book of job, not to mention general history show that dinosa...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@ishaan212
based on historical, archaeological and scientific evidence, i would say about 6 to 8 thousand years old, but i am not prepared to make a scientific argument proving this, though i feel i could make a strong scientific argument placing the earth in this range.
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@tontobones
incorrect, i believe that dinosaurs were alive within the past few thousand years based on the scientific evidence. carbon14 and soft tissue have been found in multiple dinosaur bones. this proves that the dinosaurs could not have died out 65 million years ago. i have proven you wrong.
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
yes, she is still trying to convince you. maybe if you looked at the hadrosaur soft tissue, it may help. i dont try to explain why t-rex is more similar to birds than reptiles. perhaps it is. apparently that is what studies have shown. i dont have any contradictory evidence. so, wha...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
so that source proves that the "biofilm" that was dated, that contained carbon14, was actually soft tissue. therefore, the soft tissue contained carbon14, which cannot be 65 million years old. how do you explain this?
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
"Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms" says "Carbon dating of the film points to its relatively modern origin." this article takes the view that the soft tissue was film, and says it was carbon dated. but "T-Rex 'Tissue' May Be the Real Deal After All" says "sh...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@mojohound
they tried to call it biofilm before other scientists, who wanted to be the one credited with finding soft tissue, corrected them. they tried to hide it. any way, i thought i showed you the article called "Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms" that says "Carbon da...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@mojohound
it is correct that genetics and evolution have nothing to do with eachother since evolution isnt real. how do they know that the C14 isnt from that fossil? and how do you know that the C14 was from contaminants. the original report clearly states that it was carbon dated. were they con...
-
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@no2religions
you explain the cheese. you are suggesting that the moon is made of cheese, so show a peer-reviewed article that backs up your claim. the burden of proof is on you. i claimed that soft tissue and carbon14 were found in dinosaur bones, then i showed you the peer-reviewed articles tha...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@no2religions
what could they possibly mean then? the paper starts out saying "Scientists are puzzling over a find they believed couldn't be possibly exist -bits of soft tissue from a dinosaur." it later says "scientists will need more dinosaur bones with a lot more intact tissue." are you sugges...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@no2religions
i have stated scientific peer-reviewed publications. you are calling them liars. it cannot be debated whethere soft tissue and carbon14 have been found in dinosaur bones. you refuse to address this and claim that your beliefs are still valid in the face of contradictory arguements. ...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@bary1234
its quite funny how i can bring scientific evidence that requires explanation, since it directly contradicts much of the evidence used to support evolution, and all anyone ever does is ridicule me. this isnt how science works. you people have bought into a religion. i have presented sci...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@bary1234
what lie has been told? and what evidence do you have to back up your assertion? and why havent you tried to explain the soft tissue?
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@bary1234
you arent going to try to explain the presence of soft tissue and carbon 14 in dinosaur bones? is this how science works? when someone challenges your religious views with real evidence, you call them names?
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@no2religions
why not simply provide answers to my questions instead of insulting my character? i am only trying to get those who are religiously attached to this idea of evolution to explain something that flies in the face of what you believe. soft tissue and carbon14 have been found in multipl...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Talking science with Creationists
Don't do it!!!
@IAMTHESHITEHAWK
you arent serious are you? carbon 14 has a half-life of less than 6,000 years, not 100,000 years as you claim. that means that after 100,000 years, there is no carbon 14 left. but since you acknowledge the carbon 14 was actually found in the t-rex along with other dinosaur bones,...
-
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Funny reaction from a Creationist towards an Atheist's logic
This is the original full clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Why Does A Loving God Send People To Hell?
wait, isnt that why he sends them to hell? when someone sends their dog to the pound or euthanizes a pet, are they not ultimately responsible for that action. one can blame the dog for not being a suitable house pet, but ultimately, it is the responsibility of the owner. they set the rules for th...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@Oldtinear
what do you mean metaphysical bunk? God is the only logical explanation for the existence of life, since life cannot create itself, nor can any "non-life." my guess is that you have never heard of the law of biogenesis. also, since the big bang theory violates the first law of thermody...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
no i have made a scientific argument on why evolution cannot be true and you have made a religious argument on why it must be true, since you believe that the info must be there, and that an expert, whom you trust, would not have developed a theory if there werent adequate proof. yet, th...
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
i would like to note, though, that here you are admitting that you dont feel that novel genes are created by simple mutations, but that they are created by gene duplication, and then mutation of one of the copies. am i correct?
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
ive searched for it. it doesnt happen. perhaps you could provide an example of a copy mutating into a novel gene. but i doubt it.
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@SacredSoul1990
no, but close. i said that NOVEL genes must be created in order for evolution to be plausible. not random permutations of base pairs, but actual genes, like the genes that code for human eye. if we evolved from simpler life forms, that didnt have genes to code for human eyes, they...
-
jndillaha commented 3 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
it didnt demonstrate anything because there is no evidence that the human eye or any eye developed from any other eyes or organs. it is an assumption based on the theory of evolution. but there is no evidence that it happened. the existence of simpler eyes is not evidence that more compl...
-
jndillaha commented 3 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
gene duplication is not creation of NOVEL genes, it is the duplication of pre-existing genes. this cannot explain how life evolved from simple to complex organisms. try again.
-
jndillaha commented 3 weeks ago
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
its not about advantage, because advantageous mutations, though rare, still do not ADD NOVEL genetic info. mutations like these, if they "stick" will only take life from more complex to more simple. we need examples of the opposite.
-
-
jndillaha commented 2 weeks ago
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
also, many dinosaurs have now been found with soft tissue and carbon 14. there have been hadrosaurs and an archaeopteryx, a triceratops, etc. it seems it is increasingly more common since they are actually looking for it.
as for convincing skeptics, it doesnt matter what skeptics th...
-
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@mojohound
were you going to try to explain why soft tissue and carbon 14 were found in multiple dionsaur bones? ive yet to hear your explanation for this. the presence of both proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that mainstream science is incorrect when it says that dinosaurs became extinct 65 mil...
-
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@mojohound
medical science has nothing to do with evolution. scientists simply tell you that med science's dependence on genetics is a relation to evolution. but this isnt true. nothing about medical science has anything to do with simple life evolving into complex life. now please explain the pr...
-
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Ignorant Creationist Interviewer
HERE FOR NEW VERSION OF THIS VIDEO!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Dawkins Dumbfounded by Creationist Interviewer
Whole interview...
@alltiedup217
ScienceDaily (July 29, 2009) — A new analysis of the remains of a Tyrannosaurus rex (T. rex) that roamed Earth 68 million years ago has confirmed traces of protein from blood and bone, tendons, or cartilage.
sorry, this confirms that the biofilm conclusion was incorrect. you would ...
-
Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show
There are many, many, very able creationist debaters and speakers about who WANT to debate atheists and evolutionists. Unfortunately, not many are...
@rulz492
but what you are suggesting is that the single-celled organism that all life supposedly evolved from must have contained all the genes that exist now and have ever existed. this is not possible. so they must have come about through mutation of NOVEL genes. can you or anyone propose a mod...
-
CHASING THE WILDMAN
This has been called the greatest video footage of Bigfoot since the Patterson/Gimlin film of 1967 by several different groups. It was captured on...
1,631 views
jndillaha said:
squatchmaster, was that you on Finding Bigfoot? they totally dismissed your video. i want to know why they dont mention the vocalizations in your video, and as i recall, there was another bigfoot earlier in your video, possibly in a tree. why didnt they mention of this?