Profile
Channel Views:
8,731
Total Upload Views:
2,726
Style:
Experimental
Age:
52
Joined:
Jun 30, 2006
Latest Activity:
1 day ago
Subscribers:
101
construction/builder/musician
About Me:
Sorry people but the OFFICIAL STORY is...untrue...here are a few FACTS.
33 outer columns were damaged from the impacts. You can count the columns yourself in any image or video. That's 33 out of 236 outer columns which comes out to 14%. That leaves 86% of the outer columns intact and undamaged.
NIST estimates that 6-8 core columns were damaged. That's 6-8 out of 47. 7 out of 47 comes out to 15% of the core columns were damaged leaving 85% of the core columns intact and undamaged.
Putting those two percentages together, you get 14.5% of the structure in each tower was damaged leaving 85.5% of the structure undamaged. That is minimal damage.
That means there are about 250 intact FIREPROOFED verical support remining on the impactr floor of each tower...yes the only fireproofing affected was what was involved with impacts...as INVESTIGATION found.
NIST 1-6A Appendix C Passive Fire Protection p.274..."within the debris fiels created by the aircraft impact into WTC 1 &2...thermal insulation was damaged and dislodged"
and NO EVIDENCE that ANY failed from the heat of the FIRES PRESENT.
"no core column examined showed temp. above 250C" NIST 1-3 p.95,101,132
there are those who like to claim that these columns are "NOT REPRESENTIVE" of the columns on the impact floor.....but, there are NONE that are REPRESENTIVE of the OFFICIAL STORY either....so WHAT give DIRECTION to a HYPOTHESIS that they DID?
HOW does one YEARS AFTER INVESTIGATION, officially claim that "NO explosives or accelerants were used", when INVESTIGATION NEVER TESTED to determine either way.
"NIST did not test for the residue from explosives or accelerants" wtc. nist. gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_200
who could do all this....well you only need ONE person to sign off on it....hmmmm
why was there a NEW director installed from the Bush 'inner circle' at NIST just BEFORE the reports were finalized?
NIST Director William Jeffrey
Jeffrey, 45, was nominated by President Bush on
May 25, 2005, to succeed Arden Bement, who was
appointed director of the National Science
Foundation in November of last year. NIST
Deputy Director Hratch Semerjian has served as
acting director in the interim.
Previous to his appointment as director of NIST
he served as senior director for homeland and
national security and the assistant director
for space and aeronautics at the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) within the
Executive Office of the President.
--[][][]--[][][]--Put This
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--On Your
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--Profile If
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--You Believe
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--Sharky
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--Is
--[][][]--[][][]--
--[][][]--[][][]--A Lying Whore
Label Type:
Independent
Hometown:
Boston
Country:
United States
Occupation:
Builder / Musician
Interests:
NIST letter of refusal to Validate-------
Dear Mr. Bob-----
This letter serves a the final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request (Log#10-194) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in which you requested
in connection with its investigation for the technical cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center Tower and World Trade Center Building 7 on September 1,200I:----------
'1. All input and results files of the ANSYS 16·story collapse initiation model with detailed connection models that were used to analyze the structural response to thermal loads, break element source code, ANSYS script files for the break element s, custom executable ANSYS file, and all Excel spreadsheets and other supporting calculations used to develop floor connection failure modes and capacities.---------
2. All input files with connection material properties and all results flies of the LS-DYNA 47-story global collapse model that were used to simulate sequential structural failures leading to collapse and all Excel spreadsheets and other supporting calculations used to develop floor connection failure modes and capacities."------------
NIST is withholding sixty-eight thousand, two hundred and forty-six (68,246) file. These records are currently exempt from disclosure under section (b)(3) of the FOlA., 5 .S.C § 552 (b)(3). Exemption (b)(3) permits an agency to withhold records in an agency's possession which are records that are "specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than 5 .S.C552(b», provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for
withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be ...withheld."-----------
The statute underlying the (b)(3) exemption in this case is the at National Construction Safety Team (1 C T) Act, 15 .S.. § 7301 et seq_ Section 12 of the CST Act (ISS_C § 7311) provides that it applies to the activities of 1ST in response to the attacks of September I ), 200 I. Section 7(d) of the NIST Act (15 U.S.C § 7306(d», exempts from disclosure. information received by 1ST in the course of investigations regarding building failures if the Director finds that the disclosure of the information might jeopardize public safety. On July 9 2009 the Director of NIST determined that release of the withheld information might' jeopardize public safety. Therefore, these records are being withheld.-------------
You have the right to appeal this determination. Such an appeal must be made in writing and received within 30 calendar days of the date on this letter addressed to:
Music:
Benny Goodman, Stephan Grappelli, Frank Zappa, Alan Holdsworth, Ian Anderson
Recent Activity
|
hgfbob commented on Youtube's most deleted video reuploaded!
"@DaanielOwnage
" NEVER KNOW because you cant compare it" that's where real SMART people come in to gather to figure things out! 33 outer co..." more |
|
|
|
hgfbob commented on Youtube's most deleted video reuploaded!
"@TheRenderman74
"dust shoots out! It's called air pressure" really, when does THAT occur, as SOON as you drop the book, or JUST BEFORE it ..." more |
|
|
|
hgfbob commented on 9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible
"@markh1011
""context by using no actual experiment or TESTING to validate the CLAIM," - They did plenty of tests as part of the NIS..." more |
|
|
|
hgfbob commented on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked
"@TimReed22222
"DID NOT FALL IN FREE-FALL " YOU are all taking 'free-fall' too literally. Yes, less than free-fall means there was at least ..." more |
|
|
|
hgfbob commented on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked
"@TimReed22222
'Plane crashes into tower, exploding fuel is forced down elevator shafts' lol...PROVE IT TIMMY!!! no one else has. "The towers DID N..." more |
|
Subscribers
(101)
Channel Comments
Thanks for dropping by. You have a great channel here. Nice work.
The 50 debunk vids of RKO employ all the gimmicks... battles of data, or vile ego wars. .
I notice when continuously called out as traitorous, and the obvious psychological damage years attacking folk has had on them, they pipe down and move on to the next victim. If a few would do likewise a twice a week, while passing the word to others you see wasting time compiling and typing info for [daze] attempting to convince an imbecile or an oblique agent, they can be shut down from embarrassment.
.
you would think that YOU would post something relevant to your cause...you know....something like EVIDENCE
but you use your space to attack the person posting rather than the information posted.....too funny!
You could call it Failed Musicians For 911 Twoof.
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES