LOL, you have nothing but contempt for Vahrenholt, but why only AFTER his dissent from the IPCC, and not BEFORE?? according to YOU, the IPCC is the almighty above all. Why would they employ an expert renewable energy reviewer with a conflict of interest? Or is that a pre-requisite in the IPCC, judging by porn boss Patchi's example as heavy industry Tata boss?
Oh, by the way, hobroneycutt, I'm still waiting for your answer of substance. And Phu-leeze come up with something better than the "global warming causes global cooling" rhetoric- it just ridicules your own integrity and cause. Oh, I hope that you have started saving the $1k yet, for your bet two years ago, that the next 3 years would have consecutively increasing global temps. It's time to show if you're a man of integrity and substance.

Oh dearie me!!! What a disaster to see the wheels of "the cause" coming off! Our resident scientist, in collaboration with our swiss zero have stooped themselves to the intellect of mphollow with his protein depraved and lonely grey cell. Not odd that there is a need to 'trust the calculations' instead of checking them.
If Vahrenholt really is what you claim, that says more about the IPCC than him. In any case in the "notrickzone" blog, some email responses to Vahrenholt's dissenting are on display. Some from 'Big Climate' authorities, who angrily questioned his loyalty to the cause, and emails of others that are ready and willing to support and follow his dissent. Some really interesting stuff.

"Conservatives need to learn that there is no free lunch." Economic conservatives understand this. Social conservatives on the the hand...

As for veganism, while I agree it's the right position, there are no karmatical benefits and punishments when it comes to how you treat farm animals.

Thank you for the detail, iceman. While we can trust the calculations, whose accuracy with data is a phenomenal achievement, I continue to look for exact solutions of the Navier-Stokes and related heat-transfer equations. So, I keep looking for answers in that form.

Typical of rightwing conservative like ezeeskank who never want to take responsibility for their actions.
Conservatives need to learn that there is no free lunch. They breed, pollute, and torture animals by eating them.
Typical inferior conservative mind won't make small changes now no matter how much sacrifice it costs them, but infinitely more importantly, others, later.

Anjali Appadurai in Durban:
watch?v=Ko3e6G_7GY4
watch?v=RuErqB7Ysdk

Damn, is ezee gullible! Accuses anyone who doesn't agree with him of corruption but closes his eyes exactly when he should be questioning the motives of a fellow denier. Sorry, ezee, zero points from Switzerland!

Come on Ezee, tell us what you found most convincing about Vahrenholt's science. Or "if it's good enough for Delingpole, it's good enough for Ezee" ?

You had it right first time Bueschu.The emitted fact that Vahrenholt was a 'believer' of agw until recently.

*omits the fact* =)