Thank You! Seasons Greetings!
♫♫ ʝαʑ ♫♫

thanks for subscribing to our Buster TV 1 channel. Hope you enjoy the shows

A feel good channel indeed, you been subbed by the invisible man !

GREAT channel!!!

<3

tyanks for hte commetn..keep em up on my new vids...
peac
love
music
josh

Even so, you can also argue that the New Testament alone has BY FAR the most known confirming manuscripts of any literary work in history. 24,633 near the time it was written, according to Josh McDowell. By comparison, the literary work that comes in SECOND place is Homer's Iliad with only 643. That's a MASSIVE difference!

I hope you use these points and others from research to argue with the seculars and antichrists out there on the internet about Christianity. The internet is full of them and people who follow the liberal agenda against the teachings of the Bible. God bless!

Also, there's the transcripted debate between Gerd Ludemann (a secular) and William Lane Craig (a believer) called "Jesus' Resurrection: Fact or Figment?" that I own. It shows how the resurrection was no mere hallucination of Jesus' followers like Ludemann argued.

Also, there was a Harvard professor with the royal professorship of law who was a skeptic and an antichrist who was challenged to take the 3 volumes he wrote on the laws of legal evidence and apply them to Jesus' resurrection story. He did it and became a believer in the process, saying that Jesus' resurrection is one of the best established events in history according to the laws of legal evidence!

I don't know if you've heard of it before, but you should purchase Josh McDowell's book "The New Evidence That Demands A Verdict" if you'd like to give adequate points to argue the historical validity of the New Testament. To quote a friend of mine "It's like the Christian's handbook...besides the Bible."

Of course Jesus Christ existed, I never denied that. Obviously the man was real. Nobody's denying that, as a matter of fact.
But, just because a man existed who claimed to be a divine figure in a time of utter ignorance (where we knew next to nothing about the world in comparison to what we know today, and even less when the Old Testament was written), doesn't mean he is.