Greg is a congenital liar and he keeps changing what he says. The bottom line is, he is a textbook mythomania. All the believers of Nintaijutsu, you're being set up. That ninjutsu and history courses aren't just ill-informed but dangerous. Don't buy it.
Get real and say to the other believers,
"The Choson Emperor's got nothing on!".

● Dear Tayounorise ●
Angela protested to me, "do you know about the japanese schoolbooks of history scandal??!!
Did you ever heard of Fusosha Publishing Co who try to defend the japanese invasion in korea??!!!In this schoolbooks they hide informations like comfortwoman and forcing prostitution and that koreans were forced to change their names into japanese names?!!" (original text)
My family will answer on your unjustified complaint. They explains in more detail why I call you a RACIST.
http://www.youtube.com/user...
http://www.youtube.com/user...

● Come one! Come all! ↓ ●
"Beat ChosonNinja, Culture Thief and Martial Arts Huxter"
http://www.mumyouan.com/k/?...
"朝鮮忍者まとめwiki "
http://www14.atwiki.jp/chos...
"Who is ChosonNinja?"
http://halto112.blogspot.com/
"Ninja Fraud and Cult" ← New Entry!
http://ninjer.blog.shinobi.jp/

Hi, Angela (junsuinatenshi). I'm a Tenshi, too. It takes ONE to catch ONE.

You can't argue against my contentions with primary documents or historical records. Still, you keep insisting that your meretricious nonsense is THE TRUTH. What is worse, you called my refutations to you "malicious hatepropaganda".
I required you to show the source of what you mentioned but you've been squirming your way out of answering my question.
While I make a conclusion with inductive method from specific historical records, you try to make a conclusion with deductive method on the major premise that Koreans' claims are absolutely correct, so we talk past each other.

There's no evidence, but you claim the history told by you is true, because that's THE TRUTH―

Your logic has broken down. Korean historians, too, frequently say the same lines. It's not making any sense. Put it logically as opposed to emotionally.
I'm fed up with your abstract language like "truth" and stuff like that. You'd better be more specific if some controversy exists. Well, you would if you could.

And, you also said, "i even have worked as an editorial asistant for an famous professor at a german university??!!!I even have communicated with professional historians in Germany and Japan Tokio." (original text)
Am I supposed to believe that? That's a mission impossible. I don't believe a word of it because you're full of hot air.
But, for argument's sake, let's assume that your story is right. You say you've worked for a famous German professor, but what's the big deal? Even if the professor is well known, you're just a copy clerk, right? You don't have any bragging rights.
Also, you never reveal even the professor's field as well as her/his name, so I don't know if she/he is acquainted with Japan's history or not.
We could say that about those two historians. The important thing isn't just that you've communicated with professional historians, but what those're talking about and whether the content is right or wrong. You never make mention of it, too.

So, why did you suddenly write like that? There's no necessity to explain your relationships with others―so that means you just put up a bluff, didn't you?
It goes like this: You just thought you could bring me to my knees by confronting me with the words "professor" and "historian"―
It's a sophistry. They call it "Argumentum ad Verecundiam (尊崇の誤謬)" in Logic and it's a kind of logical fallacy. You may put it into The Halo Effect. Properly speaking, of course, both are different. The latter is the terminology of Cognitive Psychology, but that's basically it.

"I socialize with some scholars and scientists bla bla bla..."

You're immature for your age.
You expected the Anonymous Authorities to defuse a difficult situation, however, they didn't help you at all. You beat your brains out but nothing has worked. It won't get you anywhere.

We're going to get back to the subject of history.
It's clear to everyone that you're ignorant of the history of East Asia. Despite this, you've poked your head into its sensitive issues. Although you're one European, you denounce Japan and the Japanese from a Korean viewpoint. It's totally unfair.

When you assert yourself, you've often brought up the words LOVE, PEACE, or RESPECT in order to shoot down anyone who disagrees with you. It's sort of like Holy Mother guides stupid Japanese properly. But love has nothing to do with historical facts.

Korean historians have been argued down by Japanese historians with each conference. Not being able to rebut, they appeal to love as you do.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
at 2:27
I feel sorry for that Japanese historians. Maybe they didn't go all the way to the Korean Peninsula because they wanted to describe their love for Korea.
Even if you and Korean historians chant a spell of love a thousand times, historical facts never change themselves into something else.

Such empty words just exacerbate the bitterness directed at Greg more and more. That would only fuel the fire, and pouring oil on the fire is not the way to quench it. To put it another way, you've cultivated feelings of HATE in the hearts of the Japanese people with a "LOVE and PEACE" song on your lips.
What you say and do is called a Performative Contradiction (遂行論的矛盾). You said you've been with a German university. If that's true, you're sure to know Dr. Jürgen Habermas (ユルゲン・ハーバーマス). If your story is true, that is.
Look up his achievements and you'll understand the meaning of the term Performative Contradiction. And then you'll "open your eyes" (this is your favorite phrase too) to the foolishness of what you're doing. You struggled to get things under control, only to muddy the waters of this problem.

Angela, you're just a sanctimonious hypocrite. Einfach komisch.
*bow*