HolyHolyHolyLordGodAlmighty!
fezik82's Channel
Alert iconSubscribed
 
 
Sign in or sign up now!
Hello, you either have JavaScript turned off or an old version of Adobe's Flash Player. Get the latest Flash player.
Pro-Life
USA
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
fezik82
Alert iconSubscribed
Loading...
Profile
 
Name:
Angela
Channel Views:
23,055
Joined:
Jan 24, 2008
Latest Activity:
Jan 24, 2008
About Me:
 
In John 12:37, the Jews had sustained their disbelief in Christ, despite His miraculous signs. St. John quoted Is 53:1, declaring that their unbelief was in fulfillment of revelation spoken through the prophet Isaiah who had seen His glory & spoke about Him. The NWT cross references this instance to Is 6:1. In this verse, Isaiah saw "Jehovah" seated on a throne, surrounded by the seraphim, who covered their faces, concealing themselves from what St. John describes as Christ's glory. While St. John professes that Isaiah had seen the glory of Christ, Isaiah affirms that his "eyes have seen the King, Jehovah of armies, himself" (Is 66:5). Jamiesson-Fausset-Brown comments:

"Lord-here [Isa 6:1] Adonai, Jehovah in Isa 6:5; Jesus Christ is meant as speaking in Isa 6:10, according to Joh 12:41. Isaiah could only have "seen" the Son, not the divine essence (Joh 1:18). The words in Isa 6:10 are attributed by Paul (Ac 28:25, 26) to the Holy Ghost. Thus the Trinity in unity is implied; as also by the thrice "Holy" (Isa 6:3)."

To better grasp what is being relayed by St. John's profession in Jn 12:41, Ps 11:4; 102:16; & Rev 21:5 in the NWT also cross references Is 6:1. These vs. speak of or imply that He Who sits upon the throne is "Jehovah", who is to appear in His glory. Likewise, 2 Chr 18:18 speaks specifically of Jehovah as seated upon the throne, cross referencing both Is 6:1 & Eze 1:26, which clarifies that upon the throne, there was a "likeness of someone in appearance like an earthling man upon it". Therefore, Matthew Henry reasons that:

"In Christ Jesus, God is seated on a throne of grace" .

While the Society has specifically commented on the content of Jn 12:41 only three times since 1950, they hold that the vision spoken of is that of "Jehovah and of the prehuman Jesus", despite context demanding reference solely to the Son:

John 12:41 Isaiah said these things because he saw his glory, and he spoke about him. 42 All the same, many even of the rulers actually put faith in him, but because of the Pharisees they would not confess [him], in order not to be expelled from the synagogue.

First, the Society's reasoning would suggest that confessing Jehovah would expel one from the synagogue! Who was mentioned in Isaiah's vision:

Isaiah 6:1.. I, however, got to see Jehovah, sitting on a throne lofty and lifted up, and his skirts were filling the temple... 5 And I proceeded to say: "Woe to me! For I am as good as brought to silence, because a man unclean in lips I am, and in among a people unclean in lips I am dwelling; for my eyes have seen the King, Jehovah of armies, himself!"

This reaction of Isaiah was repeated by Peter when after miraculously catching a multitude of fish at the hands of Christ, he fell down to His knees saying, "Depart from me, because I am a sinful man, Lord" (Lk 5:8). The mere presence of Divinity is enough to make man crumble in recognition of his faults, Isaiah 64:6, for example.

Second, while the NWT renders Is 6:1 as applicable to "Jehovah", Barnes' Notes explains:

"The Lord - In the original here the word is not יהוה yehovâh but אדני 'ădonāy... Here it is applied to Yahweh; see also Psalm 114:7, where it is also so applied; and see Isaiah 8:7, and Job 28:28, where Yahweh calls himself 'Adonai.'"

Thirdly, while the Society holds that with Jehovah, Isaiah saw the "prehuman" Jesus, they also teach that Jesus was not made "Lord" until human existence. In Mt 22:42, Jesus asked the Pharisees "whose Son is the Christ", in response they declare, "David's". Christ refers to Ps 110:1, "The utterance of Jehovah to my Lord is, sit at my right hand...'", and proceeds to ask, "How, then, is it that David by inspiration calls him 'Lord'" (Mt 22:43)? Although the Pharisees did not dare to respond (vs. 46), the Society reasons that, "Jesus thus proved that he was David's 'Lord' whom Jehovah addressed, because Jesus was David's son and was to be made 'Lord' over David". But how, then, did Isaiah refer to Him as "Lord" while the Society explains that Isaiah bore witness to His prehuman existence?

It is unlikely that He who was seen and identified as "Jehovah" in Isaiah's vision was the Father, as the interpretation of the Society tends to demand. It is understood that the early Jews held similar supposition. Justin Martyr, Athanasius, Jerome, & numerous other doctors of the early Church regarded as authorization the witness of Isaiah's death as described in the Pseudepigrapha of the 2nd century B.C., as the canon does not account for his death. In 5:11-15, we read that Manasseh ordered Isaiah to be seized & cut in half with a wooden saw; a means of death which was alluded to in Heb 11:37. Vs. 15 is clear that Manasseh had chosen such a death in the case of Isaiah, "because of the things which he had seen concerning the Beloved", possibly a misinterpretation of Exodus 33:20's statement: "No man shall see me and live".
Country:
United States
Music:
I LOVE it!
Books:
Wisdom, Isaiah, and John =)
Channel Comments
fezik82 (1 day ago)
When you say, "as explained by the RCC today", I assume that you're referencing the Creeds... I hope that you understand that even the pope is clear in his writings that his interpretations of the verses that he is writing about are his own opinions.
fezik82 (1 day ago)
Thanks, I do need more time! The explanations for the Trinity have definitely expanded over time! I think that Tertullian was talking about the Trinity when he wrote, "I believe because it is absurd" (I must note that he often supplied fantastic Trinity 'proofs', so he had reason to believe... other than the 'absurdity' =D ). Pope Benedict was interviewed years back (I read it in "Salt of the Earth") and was asked whether he sides more with this quote of Tertullian, or with a more profound quote of St. Augustine's. He was clear that he did not agree here with Tertullian, he pointed out that Tertullian often tended to lean toward anti-philosophy, and that's just it. The writers in the early Church (as today) were very much in agreement with the whole of the Scriptures, but they did form different opinions in some areas. John of Damascus disagreed with the Latin theologians in regards to John 14:28, for example. The concept has also expanded over time.
tommotian (2 days ago)
Take your time!
It is said about Augustine Hippo that the question about the Trinity, how to understand it, bothered him. Then Christ appeared to him as a man while Aug. was walking alongside the shore, and told him not to worry about understanding it. ... This is what I was told. I also think that the Trinity concept has varied over time. Maybe the concept 1900 years ago was not what we NOW believe it is, or quite as explained by the RCC today.
tommotian (2 days ago)
Hi Angela! A question for you on my wall, you will recognize the subject! It IS provocative, but is not meant as a derogatory comment about the Trinity, which not even Augustine Hippo could understand. [Then why would I?] I am illustrating a very difficult point to understand if we are to believe Jesus OWN WITNESS about his Father - and we must believe what Jesus IS REALLY saying!
Sometimes a very basic question is a good way to illustrate a problem; a starting point, like a door, an entry.
czekehazi (1 week ago)
Awesome song by Tommy Makem! Happy New Year, Fezik!
tommotian (1 week ago)
The music video is "It's my life" by Bon Jovi. Very popular.
tommotian (2 weeks ago)
Hi Angela!
I listened to your Irish music and liked it. My newly featured video is way wilder but reflects very well on my mood right now.
Remain sage and safe!
fezik82 (3 weeks ago)
He may not have even noticed, it doesn't seem that he is on often. I wish that he'd come on more often! It's been some time.

BTW, you should watch my featured video... it's a great song! I used to watch him every year at the Cleveland Irish Cultural Festival until he passed, that festival kind of stinks without him =(
tommotian (3 weeks ago)
jubil is one of those using the new channel design. I think it is terrible. I will not use it!
tommotian (4 weeks ago)
Can't believe it how prod and kg are feeding the monster on the Faulty instead of starving it!
Recent Activity  
There hasn't been any recent activity.
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more