Thumbs up for that last guy!

Your a fucking inbreed!!! Stop breeding!!!

Hello :)
Thanks a lot for the sub. I'm glad you liked the sounds on my channel.
You are welcome,
Melodía

Cool videos here
greetings from Berlin

Hello. I’m new here. Just launched a new show. So- give it a peek and let me know what you think, k?

Finally, they intend to use it, big time, for population management; in a post-industrial society, they themselves have declared they won't need so many workers. So, they say, they need to massively reduce population numbers, and why not do it 'to save the Earth'? As much of a good pretext as any other, mildly believable, and it sure beats "manifest destiny", Lebensraum, or racial inferiority.
And, they've actually been doing it in the 3rd world, although they use many different pretexts there, not just the 'saving the planet' one.

So, yes, I'm into solutions that will actually protect the environment, but we truly have to scrap this existing mega-structure all along. It didn't only co-opt real environmental concerns; it actually fights to conceal them and serve as a pied-piper, therefore working against the environment itself, not to mention the human populations.

They use the environmental movement as a weapon for neo-colonial takeover of resources, all around the world, but mainly in the 3rd world.
They use it to steer people's attention away from REAL environmental problems caused by their corporations (GMO, toxic waste dumping, over-fishing, etc), and into bogus causes, like hot air.
They then use it to shake masses of new taxes out of the public, over that hot air, in the form of 'green taxes'.
And they use it as a pretext for the establishment of their corporate international governance, in the form of 'environmental treaties', that are in fact economic takeover treaties.

Yes, you're right in your observations. I don't see why a nation-state (or even a group of nation-states acting in concert) shouldn't find democratic regulations to protect the environment. Particularly when it comes to GM, which is undoubtedly the most perverse way of pollution ever invented.
Although, this is the key here: the "hyper-structure" of environmentalist organizations you have in the world today, was set up, top to bottom, by the anglo/euro/american powerhouses of banking. From the IUCN and the WWF, and their armies of aggregated NGOs, down to a plethora of national and local environmental groups. It's very rare to find a really honest organization. Most will be staffed by decent people, and will do good projects on several instances, true, but the main directives always come from the top, where the funding, the grants and the public relations come from. And those boys aren't interested in the least about the environment, and you can't get a square deal from them.

There's a very interesting song, Crimson King that, among other interesting observations, says: «The gardener plants an evergreen; whilst trampling on a flower». Back in those days, when those rock stars were on the go with all the aristocracy, and the big bankers, in their parties, they came up with very interesting stuff. It's like Pink Floyd who wrote about how people would give up liberty for hot air. Anyway, this was just a sidenote.

Eugenics is one thing; environmentalism is another. Yet, what is happening is that environmentalism is being used as a leitmotif to impose eugenical measures and feudal impoverishment across society. We in the west are not the most affected by it, yet; africans, asians and other poor peoples across the world are.
And it's ironic, to watch the biggest polluters ever - people like the Rockefellers - promoting "environmentalism". And, all the while, they disrupt ecosystems with GMO. And they push for their one-child policies, population reduction, and all the rest of the agenda. It's just another pretext. Back in the 30s, it was 'to perfect humanity'; now it's 'to save the planet'.