eskillade's channel

we are talking about a 2100 lbs civic, not a 3500 lbs Camaro, besides there is no sense in putting over 200 hp in a fwd car unless you like understeer, its not the size of your sword, its how you use it, and i would rather a 30 mpg civic with equal power-weight ratio as a 15 mpg small block Chev ...

thats one nice sleeper...........pun intended

i love the idea of putting a $5,000 engine (stock) investing another couple G's into turbo and internals and putting it into a $500 shell, egs and eks are better suited for b16s and b18s, its alot cheaper because they made alot more of them and they are becoming plentiful in junkyards, k20s are ...

you cant even see the front grill, and usualy custom chop top mods comprimise the handling drasticly, but i love the 2 tone chevy look, clean car overall

what type of car is joe pesci driving? its not a monte, its not a cutlass and its not a grand national

CFC is an abomination that has claimed the lives of countless future classic cars. could you imagine a world today if a CFC Program existed in 1973? all i can say is its an insult to nearly a century of bold american engineering

nice sleeper, my buddys got an 95 coupe wit a b17 ,dc 2-1s, and a skunk intake, runs 0-60 in 6 seconds flat, and gets 30 mpg still

this is not a front wheel drive chasis, it would be astronomicly expensive to take ex. a 1988 plymouth lazer (similar looking car) and do such modifications

damn thats cool, i wish that i could drop that into my tercel so i could actualy have merging power lol

out of the factory yes, but after time the windsor 5.0 OHV design will outlast the cammed 4.6 turd, not to mention the 5.0 has a much more tasteful sound when floored

its too bad the american market will most likely not get the same performance, or even get that car, JDM ALL DAY

90 hp would be an overstatement, those 1.5 sohc's make about 78 HP and ALMOST 90 ft lbs