Videos
(7)
[TRANSLATED]
Evolution Types
[TRANSLATED]
Evolution Types
Just a short video to explain there is confusion among debaters of evolution/creat...
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #5 (co...
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #5 (constellations + sun)
Hovind's answer part 5
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #4 (re...
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #4 (red shift)
Part 4 of Hovind's answer
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #3 (+ ...
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #3 (+ red shift)
Part 3 of Hovind's answer
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #2
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #2
Part 2 of Hovind's answer.
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #1
[TRANSLATED]
How we see stars far away #1
Apparently young Earth creationists have the problem of stars being so far away....
[TRANSLATED]
Evolution is a religion
[TRANSLATED]
Evolution is a religion
Evolutionists admit that evolution is a religion
Humans don't evolve:
http://w...
My Vlog
The Missing Link, or, "Hey, Ida Preferred a Hipper Name"
May 29, 2009, 06:31 AM
Issues, Etc. host, Todd Wilken, discusses how fossilized Ida plays into evolutionary theory with Dr. Menton of Answers in Genesis.
www.issuesetc.org
answersingenesis.org
Permalink
Rate this video
16 ratings
Favorites
(48)
[TRANSLATED]
Spanish Guitar Online Guitar Les...
[TRANSLATED]
Spanish Guitar Online Guitar Lesson For Beginners
http://www.6-string-videos.com/spanishyoutube
For the tabs.
Simple chords and pi...
[TRANSLATED]
Did Dinosaurs Live With Man? Lau...
[TRANSLATED]
Did Dinosaurs Live With Man? Laughable?
Sample from Bob Dutkos' CD series top ten proofs.
www.toptenproofs.com
If ...
[TRANSLATED]
Ian McCormack Testimony Part 1
[TRANSLATED]
Ian McCormack Testimony Part 1
A Glimpse Of Eternity Re-enactment Part 1 of 9
[TRANSLATED]
Sproul / Stein interview Part 1 ...
[TRANSLATED]
Sproul / Stein interview Part 1 of 3
RC Sproul interviews Ben Stein about the theory of evolution and about Stein's upc...
[TRANSLATED]
Sproul / Stein interview Part 2 ...
[TRANSLATED]
Sproul / Stein interview Part 2 of 3
RC Sproul interviews Ben Stein about the theory of evolution and Stein's upcoming ...
[TRANSLATED]
Sproul / Stein interview Part 3 ...
[TRANSLATED]
Sproul / Stein interview Part 3 of 3
RC Sproul interviews Ben Stein about the theory of evolution and Stein's upcoming ...
[TRANSLATED]
Evolution Exposed by Evolutionis...
[TRANSLATED]
Evolution Exposed by Evolutionists & Chicken Little
Chicken Little exposes Evolution for the lie that it is...
This video will demon...
[TRANSLATED]
AoC good times with a horse
[TRANSLATED]
AoC good times with a horse
Having fun with a horse mount!
[TRANSLATED]
Global Warming Hoax
[TRANSLATED]
Global Warming Hoax
The reason why it is a Hoax
Subscribers
(16)
Friends
(31)
Channel Comments
(52)
|
CandlesInADaze
(18 hours ago)
Interesting videos, friend.
|
|
|
Thothsglyphs
(1 week ago)
Good job, you know that Charles Darwin didn't make the proposition. He did make evolution by natural selection though, and followed the words of his father(maybe grandfather, but i forgot). By the way, the big bang is not cosmic evolution. The big bang is cosmology, and nothing else. Chemical evolution has nothing to do with the real term either because it is in cosmological physics, along with stellar evolution Organic Evolution is explained by abiogenesis. And you are well aware what form of real evolution I am talking about. Macro Evolution, the biology side. Now please finish answering my questions.
|
|
|
Thothsglyphs
(1 week ago)
I doubt that you know anything about evolution theory. Tell me this then. Were there any observed instances of speciation? What is evolution responsible for? Who proposed that we evolved from simpler life forms? And how random is evolution? By the way, please don't use Hovind arguments. Many creationists use them like they are new and fresh arguments, which cannot be further from the truth.
|
|
|
Thothsglyphs
(2 weeks ago)
Why do you disable your comments? Only people who are closed minded do that.
|
|
|
IAMINDESPAIR
(1 month ago)
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, it is the one most responsive to change."
Simply put, if something were to happen like a BIG meteor striking the earth, and human civilization was reduced to living like animals, the traits of the humans most responsive to this change would be the most likely to survive, and hence, reproduce, which would result (over many generations) in the emergence of a new species with the features most required to survive in the new environment. |
|
|
rba718
(1 month ago)
"Changes within animal kinds only happen if there is a mutation (loss of information) in the dna."
And what would cause the mutation? My point is the lack of gravity could very well have that kind of impact on us. We live our entire lives around gravity. Take that out of the picture and it wouldn't be surprising if after a few hundred or thousand generations you actually did get some physical changes. And why wouldn't they inherit the change? As it stands in the scenario, no one's using their legs anymore, they're using their arms almost 100% of the time to move around the space station. Unless we'd be constantly exercising our legs, they would eventually dwindle in the same way any muscle would if you were a couch potato. Are you seriously asking me to provide evidence for a random scenario I'm using to explain something to you? One that hasn't even occurred yet? lol |
|
|
rba718
(1 month ago)
Well obviously it won't work like that if you do it intentionally as in, cutting off your legs, but there is a major difference here.
I'm saying there's an outside influence, the lack of gravity, which obviously means for the most part you won't be walking like you normally would. This means you won't be using your legs as much and instead pulling yourself around with your arms. If the entire population started doing this while in space, eventually, there's going to be some physical changes. |
|
|
rba718
(1 month ago)
Hmm, seems my comment disappeared, or maybe it's just an error, whatever I'll redo it.
You're missing the point here, a major factor for evolution is an outside influence and how the species reacts and adapts to it. Why the amoebas evolved, we can only theorize. But why would we? We have everything we could possibly ask for so what possible outside influence would ever require us to adapt? I'll give you one scenario so you can understand. Let's say, we started living on space stations out in space where there was no gravity. To get around the station, we'd most likely just use our arms like they do on the space station. We'd rarely use our legs, and in turn, say, a few thousand years from now, they'd probably grow scrawny while our arms would get stronger. Fast forward a few million years and they might alter into different limbs completely. Possibly even an extra set of arms? lol |
|
|
rba718
(1 month ago)
What was his ideology? Please describe it.
As far as I know, a lot of his motives involved politics and his own faith. Actual Atheism playing a role in this literally makes no sense at all, and neither does an idea of evolution. |
|
|
rba718
(1 month ago)
When did Hitler invent his own Darwin religion? lol Do you have evidence of this?
From what I've seen, a lot of the WW2 Nazi stuff had a lot to do with his old Catholic faith. In fact, on Nazi belt buckles was written "Gott Mit Untz" which is German for "God With Us". In Mein Kampf Hitler even wrote about himself being a messenger from God to fight the 'Jew' as he puts it. I don't see anything very Atheistic or Darwinistic about any of this. |
Add to iGoogle















