Eightfootmanchild, I need you to make another video because I'm going into withdrawal.

Have mercy, sir.

You have provided rectally extracted naked assertions trussed up in quasi-syllogistic language.

"8foot would not supply any atheistic answers to questions such as these below"

I've answered those questions many, many times in situations where I knew an actual conversation would take place. This is not one of those situations. Consequently, I have zero interest in continuing this exchange. Get the fuck off my channel.

I have provided numerous clear proof and answers in truth and in logic. Atheists hate the truth

Do you believe the Laws of Logic are fixed?

Do you believe in certain truth?

Do you believe in immutable moral law?

What the fuck are you talking about? NO WHERE did I say there was anything magic about logic. I was using that to illustrate YOUR position. Are you capable of holding a thought for more than a few minutes at a time?

8foot

Thus one more anti-theist who denies the Laws of Logic as Laws inasmuch as he calls them magical rather than affirming the truth he so dislikes.

He joins the legion of anti-theists who are professed anti-logical epistemological misfits. He is a non-rational alogical non-reasonable anti-rational, illogical, self-stultifying anti-theist.

This "argument" (actually just a god of the gaps assertion with a few bells and whistles glued on, except in this case there's not even a "gap") always breaks down the same way:

P1: The laws of logic are absolute, immaterial and immutable
HIDDEN PREMISE: There's something magical about that
P2: Yahweh is also absolute, immaterial and immutable (and magical)
C: No logical absolutes without Yahweh

No one is convinced of this kind of crap, save people who already believe, and not even all of them are.

In any case, the universe does not only refer to physical constituents, but ALL things that exist, including the emergent processes and forces which supervene on them, such as motion. These are "immaterial" in the exact same sense that the laws of logic are.

And there is no "greater" in this discussion. Immaterial processes, forces, etc. are not "better" than the physical things they supervene on. Your choice of language is very typical if apologists - you think by making an absurd value judgment on logical absolutes, you can draw a better relation between them and your "god", who is purportedly "better" than his creation.

I said absolutely nothing about "the cosmos". I don't know where you're getting this from, but it's a clever choice of word on your part. You're trying to draw a distinction between the physical constituents of the universe and the emergent immaterial forces which supervene on them, as if there's something "magical" about them. If you had actually been honest and used the word "universe" (i.e. all that exists, INCLUDING emergent properties), you would have contradicted yourself by inferring a "non-universal universe", AND you would have conceded that there is nothing inherently "magic" about it that needs "accounting" for. You've obviously been doing this for a while, and I commend you on your attempt at obfuscation. Better luck next time.

8footMC
Your post on my page was Incorrect. The lessor cannot account for the greater.

The material non-immutable non-universal cosmos lacks the attributes to account for and ground the immaterial immutable universal Laws of logic; only God has such attributes and He alone accounts for and grounds the laws of logic as well as moral law.

This is completely scriptural, nobody actually knows what God is to be precise.

Universally, he does not exist, but as an event and cause he does..