Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
Alert icon
dunklaw

dunklaw's channel

Loading...

10 subscribers
0 video views
  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

    Tickling Slow Loris

    video by Dmitry Sergeyev

    dunklaw said:

    WATCH

    h t t p://w w w.bbc. co. uk/programmes/p00nj6bx

    + 2 more videosshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

    Re: Jesus / Titus Walking Through Grain Fields

    More evidence for the Caesar's Messiah thesis, otherwise known as the Flavian Hypothesis.

    dunklaw said:

    Oh I forgot to mention about the Sumerian texts that say that the gods gave man the plough as a curse but you probably already know that one.

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      Re: Jesus / Titus Walking Through Grain Fields

      More evidence for the Caesar's Messiah thesis, otherwise known as the Flavian Hypothesis.

      dunklaw said:

      To put my link in context see:-

      watch?v=ddmQhIiVM48

      A fairly long lecture (but please stick with it), in the first cent Roman period "food (energy) was power" - just like today!

      (Genesis 4:2) . . .Cain became a cultivator of the ground. - I see this as an image of warning.

      watch?v=ZjdQ_Btl9jQ...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 3 days ago

      Re: Jesus / Titus Walking Through Grain Fields

      More evidence for the Caesar's Messiah thesis, otherwise known as the Flavian Hypothesis.

      dunklaw said:

      w w w. wildwinds. com/coins/ric/titus/RIC_0571[vesp].jpg

      w w w. wildwinds. com/coins/ric/titus/RIC_0571[vesp].txt

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 3 days ago

      Re: Jesus / Titus Walking Through Grain Fields

      More evidence for the Caesar's Messiah thesis, otherwise known as the Flavian Hypothesis.

      dunklaw said:

      wildwinds. com/coins/ric/titus/RIC_0571%5Bvesp%5D.jpg

      wildwinds. com/coins/ric/titus/RIC_0571%5Bvesp%5D.txt

    + View allshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

    John 20:19-31 - Context Examined - Part 14

    Summary of the video: John 20:28, "the lord (adon) of me" because that's who he was to all his disciples (vv. 13, 18, 20, 25) and "the god (elohim)...

    dunklaw said:

    @TheGenuineChristian with regards to the how El & Elohim is used you have to compare it to older Semitic related texts.

    sron.nl/~jheise/signlists/list3.html

    SEE "EN" (equivalent to EL) & "EN.EN.EN(EN.)" Equivalent to Elohim.

    Unfortunately these online lexicons are out of date, En means Mighty ...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      John 20:19-31 - Context Examined - Part 14

      Summary of the video: John 20:28, "the lord (adon) of me" because that's who he was to all his disciples (vv. 13, 18, 20, 25) and "the god (elohim)...

      dunklaw said:

      @TheGenuineChristian - see :-

      vintage.aomin.org/GRANVILL.html

      Their own argument working against them LOL.

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      John 20:19-31 - Context Examined - Part 14

      Summary of the video: John 20:28, "the lord (adon) of me" because that's who he was to all his disciples (vv. 13, 18, 20, 25) and "the god (elohim)...

      dunklaw said:

      @TheGenuineChristian It tells us that Thomas was not there when Jesus first appeared to the disciples - but this is a separate event to Mary telling the disciples what Jesus had said, so when Thomas did see - I think that he is just agreeing with what Mary had told them - "the lord of me" (Jesus)...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      John 20:19-31 - Context Examined - Part 14

      Summary of the video: John 20:28, "the lord (adon) of me" because that's who he was to all his disciples (vv. 13, 18, 20, 25) and "the god (elohim)...

      dunklaw said:

      @TheGenuineChristian This is one of the major problems of Semitic Koine not all the Hebrew/Aramaic phases are clear but the context is fairly clear.

      (John 20:17) But be on your way to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and YOUR Father and to my God and YOUR God.’”

      Did Tho...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      John 20:19-31 - Context Examined - Part 14

      Summary of the video: John 20:28, "the lord (adon) of me" because that's who he was to all his disciples (vv. 13, 18, 20, 25) and "the god (elohim)...

      dunklaw said:

      @TheGenuineChristian John 10:32-36 is referring to a group (plural) Elohim so each individual judge would be an EL.

      The same is applicable to Psa 82:6 - the sons (plural) so each son is an EL.

      In a masculine singular sentence structure like :-

      Sa 2:25 If one man sin against another, the High j...

    + View allshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

    "My Lord and my God"

    Commentary on John 20:28

    dunklaw said:

    @Haukman66 - so the Hebrew can be interpreted as "I am [he]" or "I am [it]" depending on sentence structure - but in either case this is not referring to YHWH character. It is a straight forward reply (I am not a believer in hidden bible codes as some are).

    NLT sums it up quite well:-

    You have ...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @Haukman66 Would the blind man be claiming the same status?

      (John 9:9) Some would say: “This is he.” Others would say: “Not at all, but he is like him.” The man would say: “I am [he].”

      Only a few verses further on - I see this as a bit of a stretch for the word usage and dialogue.

      Isaiah 43:1...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 2 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @Haukman66 Let's not over stretch the meaning of the dialogue.

      (John 7:31, 32) “When the Christ arrives, he will not perform more signs than this man has performed, will he?” The Pharisees heard the crowd murmuring these things about him, and the chief priests and the Pharisees dispatched offic...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 3 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @Haukman66 In Semitic Koine one of the standard classical Greek tenses is missing - Ego Eimi can mean "I am" - but can also mean "I have been" - combining this with the textual variant reading of the earlier verse - It could just be effectively saying "I (Jesus) was the one Abraham was expecting ...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 3 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @Haukman66 Textual variant :- "Abraham has seen you?"

      KJV Joh 14:9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been (ego eimi)

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 3 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed Just that this linguistic similarity along with trade route paths between northern & southern India (spice trade) too Rome from about 60BCE onwards means a significant Vedic influence in the whole region & John as a later document seems full of this ideological influence - rem...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 4 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed

      see:-

      watch?v=OcZ8yf2gXmo

      Particularly from 3:45 - 4:28

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 4 days ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed The quote with reference has already been posted.

      "Krishna Yajurveda, Kathaka Samhita, 12.5, 27.1; Krishna Yajurveda, Kathakapisthala Samhita, 42.1; Jaiminiya Brahmana II, Samaveda, 2244"

      drishtikone. com/beginning-there-was-word-and-then-it-was-copied/

    + View allshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 3 days ago

    dunklaw said:

    @wayman29 Here's a little bonus:-

    bsu. edu/libraries/virtualpress/wol­fe/word/ParallelTeachings.pdf

    • Why Jesus IS NOT the "pre-human", archangel Michael.

      Dr Anthony F. Buzzard

      Prof. of Hebrew & Greek

      Atlanta Bible College

      dunklaw said:

      I have a feeling that "Theophory" in the OT text's is in relation to ruling (EL & Baal being a parallel branch) & priestly status (YAH). Something worth investigating in more detail?

    • Why Jesus IS NOT the "pre-human", archangel Michael.

      Dr Anthony F. Buzzard

      Prof. of Hebrew & Greek

      Atlanta Bible College

      dunklaw said:

      I think you should also look at the works of H.W.F. Saggs - then you will also recognise the book of Enoch for what it is - a Jewish reinterpretation of Persian myth.

      aina.org/books/eliba/eliba.pdf

      "A text relates that ’the seven evil gods [a particular group of demons]

      forced their way into th...

    • The lie of religion - Why religion does not save

      This video shows why religion can't save you.

      Comments allowed provided they are respectful.

      Heard the good news?

      http://www.youtube.com/watc......

      dunklaw said:

      (1 John 5:2, 3) 2 By this we gain the knowledge that we are loving the children of God, when we are loving God and doing his commandments. 3 For this is what the love of God means, that we observe his commandments;

    + 2 more videosshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 4 days ago

    "My Lord and my God"

    Commentary on John 20:28

    dunklaw said:

    @iamTOTALLYredeemed I have to admit that I get very tired of arguing this - over and over - with so many people but the thing is that those who argue for Jesus being god & the trinity concept usually argue only from John & later writings. If you could make a convincing argument for your stand fro...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed I thought we had already established that it is unimportant in the case of John 20:28 due to the twin definite articles. In fact if Thomas was unambiguously claiming that Jesus was god in the Greek sense then why would he not just say "the god of me" - to mention "lord of me" ...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed Just one more point, scholars today do not call the majority of NT Koine but rather Semitic Koine as a branch of the root language. Like the kind of English spoken in America or more dramatically the kind of English spoken in Caribbean. Recently it has been discovered that a s...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed Yes interpretations - western & eastern thinking and language are very different. Have a look at a mechanical translation of the Hebrew:-

      Exo 4:16 and~he~did~much~SPEAK HE to~you(ms) TO the~PEOPLE and~he~did~EXIST HE he~will~EXIST to~you(ms) to~MOUTH and~YOU(ms) you(ms)~will...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed This is why the KJV translators could put:-

      1Sa 2:25 If one man sin against another, the judge (Elohim) shall judge him

      Its a designation of status in authority.

      A better way to translate this would be :-

      Sa 2:25 If one man sin against another, the High judge shall judge...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed As I have already stated to @TrinityEqualsHell both EL & ELOHIM are translated as theos with no differentiation accept where it does not suit this type of theology (where elohim got changed to angels etc.)

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed "elohim has other definitions" - you are still not getting my point from the Hebraic concrete perspective. Whether YHWH is called by the term Elohim, El shaddai, El gibbor etc. NON of these designate deity as you understand it. The definitions (as you put it) are later INTERPR...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed 1Sa 14:15 And there was trembling in the host, in the field, and among all the people: the garrison, and the spoilers, they also trembled, and the earth quaked: so it was a **very great** (Elohim) trembling.

    + View allshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

    Freelee: I'm a judgmental vegan b*tch! (Dj remix)

    This is me ranting, don't take it personally, instead listen to the message and step up!

    My website and book: http://www.30bananasaday.com

    My fan...

    dunklaw said:

    !! P E R M A C U L T U R E !!

    + One more: Likedshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

    "My Lord and my God"

    Commentary on John 20:28

    dunklaw said:

    @iamTOTALLYredeemed Exodus 4:16 is qualified by Exo 4:15 and you will speak to him, and you will place the words in his mouth, and I will exist with your mouth and with his mouth, and I will [teach] you (what) you must do,

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @TrinityEqualsHell I understand your motivation for this argument but I think you are in error - the rule is valid. The key to this is understanding what is being alluded too. "great God" is the key. We all know that YHWH is the greatest god - there is no need for this term in the language unless...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed from the Vulgate (a highly underated translation)

      Isaiah 9:6 CHILD IS BORN to us, and a son is given to us, and the government is upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, God the Mighty, the Father of the future of the world, Prince of Peace.

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed Incidentally have a look at this video:-

      The Isaiah Scroll - Part 2 of 2 - Isaiah 9:6

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed With regards to Isaiah the LXX has variations from the MT - but since the discovery of the DSS great Isaiah scroll we now know that the MT & the DSS are almost identical - where does this leave the LXX?

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed I am talking about the particular wordings of the book - not the book itself - so stop trying to twist my words. Niece was when things came to a head not when they started. There is evidence of the many books & versions of books that were burned after Nicea. The victor writes ...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed WHAT !!! QUOTED WHAT !!! - Take a lesson from Matthew "“YOU heard that it was said“ an optimistic estimate is that 6% of the population were literate at this time and the majority of the writings you are referring too are NOT IN TORAH (so even if the 72 myth were true it would...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      "My Lord and my God"

      Commentary on John 20:28

      dunklaw said:

      @iamTOTALLYredeemed The authority of Jewish scripture does NOT include a Trinity.

    + View allshow less

  • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

    Why Jesus is the created, unique human Son of God.

    Dr Anthony F. Buzzard

    Prof. of Hebrew & Greek

    Atlanta Bible College

    dunklaw said:

    @AbrahamicMovement Koine Greek has a fairly large range of options - these phrases are word for word identical to Mark with additions before or after. Besides there is plenty of evidence (mostly ignored) that Q was Aramaic & that most textual variants in the NT can be accounted for by split trans...

    • dunklaw dunklaw commented 1 week ago

      Why Jesus is the created, unique human Son of God.

      Dr Anthony F. Buzzard

      Prof. of Hebrew & Greek

      Atlanta Bible College

      dunklaw said:

      That's one interpretation - but we are not talking about wording or minor events but something rather more fundamental. I actually subscribe to the Q theory. When looked at critically in this light the synoptic are suspicious in the similarity of wording not events . John has a very Greek/Vedic s...

    + View allshow less

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more