@Devalmand The fact that we only see artist renditions in this video? Or maybe inductive argumentation: 1. There is no evidence 2. Therefore the likelihood of it not existing is greater.
So is it not the other way around? Where is the proof of it existing?
The only thing I find interesting is the fact that this person, unbeknown to him/her, is being watched almost 100 years later in a youtube video on something called "the internet". In a way you might say we are the time travelers.
@Devalmand The fact that we only see artist renditions in this video? Or maybe inductive argumentation: 1. There is no evidence 2. Therefore the likelihood of it not existing is greater.
So is it not the other way around? Where is the proof of it existing?